|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Belmont N.S. Canada
Posts: 473
Likes: 246
Liked 166 Times in 71 Posts
|
![]()
Has anyone tested these two castings back to back, or the 241? Whether it be on flow bench or dyno. We want to do a new set for my dad's car as his seats are beat pretty bad but before I hunt for castings it would be nice to know if one is better than the other to start with. Thanks.
__________________
Chris Chapman 1969 Chevelle NHRA F-G/SA 1090 Last edited by Chipper Chapman; 12-30-2016 at 12:40 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pukwana SD
Posts: 860
Likes: 554
Liked 99 Times in 49 Posts
|
![]()
I never saw anything 241` or 820s never had 292.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
292 is a small block casting.
__________________
don,t have one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Belmont N.S. Canada
Posts: 473
Likes: 246
Liked 166 Times in 71 Posts
|
![]()
292 is also a 71/72 big block casting. 820's seem to be the most common here north of the border, and what we are running now. Hard to find any good info on them, most places I have found online talking about them just praise how good they all can be with big valves and hours of porting, nothing about as cast.
__________________
Chris Chapman 1969 Chevelle NHRA F-G/SA 1090 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 884
Likes: 209
Liked 312 Times in 175 Posts
|
![]()
Contact John Armstrong. He's your neighbor and he's the man.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Belmont N.S. Canada
Posts: 473
Likes: 246
Liked 166 Times in 71 Posts
|
![]()
Hasn't seen enough of these himself to say if one better than another.
__________________
Chris Chapman 1969 Chevelle NHRA F-G/SA 1090 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|