|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 66
Liked 704 Times in 281 Posts
|
![]()
Just curious on what drivers think or know the amount of time in reaction times are human and how much is car reaction. Foot brake or trans brake. So if. 500 is perfect. What if you were averaging .540 how much is human and how much car. Just curious if anyone knows.
Last edited by Jeff Stout; 05-13-2017 at 10:37 AM. Reason: More |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 883
Likes: 206
Liked 310 Times in 174 Posts
|
![]()
I think Frank Hawley did some exclusive testing on this a few years ago. See if you can find his numbers.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 674
Likes: 15
Liked 584 Times in 94 Posts
|
![]()
Jeff, Sometime ago Frank Hawley did a story, I think was published in National Dragster. He studied and verified the difference between Driver and Car reaction time. He had actually set up a pretty cool device that separated the driver and car response. With that being said, I'm too old to remember the final details of the study, ( I'm lucky I even remember the study) , but car set up had a significant role in the true reaction time. Maybe somebody with access to the ND archives or Frank Hawley could help us out.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
|
![]()
__________________
Steve Calabro 1199 STK, SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 66
Liked 704 Times in 281 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks for the replies. I read the info from Frank Hawley. The Biondo story was very informative. I was asking because I raced on instant green. No yellows and was .506,.516,.540. Which made me think about what the car wad doing and what I was doing. I've run the same car at events with. 5 pro tree and had the same numbers with. 500 being perfect.
Last edited by Jeff Stout; 05-13-2017 at 11:47 AM. Reason: More |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 215
Likes: 16
Liked 79 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 66
Liked 704 Times in 281 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Human reaction time, of course, varies from person to person and tends to drop off in both speed and consistency with age. Significant age related reaction time loss tends to happen in the mid-sixties, though that does not seem to be the case with Jim Boudreau
![]() Human reaction to visual stimulus (bulb) averages around .180. It's faster in response to touch (.155) and sound (.140). It's considered impossible for the human to react faster than .100. in modern track and field, it's considered a foul if someone moves faster than .100 from the gun. I expect it's fair to estimate the human contribution to the overall reaction time (car plus driver) to be about .200. How to improve it, well, is another story. Bruce Deveau |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,116
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,830 Times in 415 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks Bruce, very useful information.
I believe I attended one of your seminars at PRI a few years back. That, too, was very informative.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Liked 43 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
Maybe 20 years ago, weren't there special sunglasses being marketed that would improve your response time to certain color frequencies?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|