HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-25-2021, 08:21 AM   #1
e vassar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 382
Likes: 67
Liked 271 Times in 107 Posts
Default F.I. fuel pressure theories

36lb injectors at 50 psi or 42lb injectors at 40 psi . If I am able to achieve an optimal A/F either way...which will produce more power and greater consistency? Either? My theory is the higher pressure going through the smaller orifice will produce a finer mist..or better atomization which is always better? Or not?
e vassar is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 03-25-2021, 10:27 AM   #2
Stan Weiss
Senior Member
 
Stan Weiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Liked 734 Times in 385 Posts
Default Re: F.I. fuel pressure theories

Has anyone looked at say running the 42 lb injector at say 55 PSI which would have a reduced pulse width / duty cycle verses the 36 lb injector at 50 PSI?

Stan
Stan Weiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2021, 10:53 AM   #3
Pierce Jones
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Chatham, ON. Canada
Posts: 19
Likes: 15
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: F.I. fuel pressure theories

I run my 24 lbs injectors at 70 psi. Theory is the injector acts larger and high pressure atomizes fuel better. I believe Ed Wright posted on this topic in the past.

Last edited by Pierce Jones; 03-25-2021 at 05:06 PM.
Pierce Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2021, 11:44 AM   #4
e vassar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 382
Likes: 67
Liked 271 Times in 107 Posts
Default Re: F.I. fuel pressure theories

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan Weiss View Post
Has anyone looked at say running the 42 lb injector at say 55 PSI which would have a reduced pulse width / duty cycle verses the 36 lb injector at 50 PSI?

Stan
So turn the pressure back up to 50 and shorten the duration cycle?
e vassar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2021, 12:11 PM   #5
Stan Weiss
Senior Member
 
Stan Weiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Liked 734 Times in 385 Posts
Default Re: F.I. fuel pressure theories

Quote:
Originally Posted by e vassar View Post
So turn the pressure back up to 50 and shorten the duration cycle?

Yes, as you increase the fuel pressure the injector flow rate increases. But if fuel needed has not changed then you need to short / decrease the amount of time that fuel is flowing.

Stan
Stan Weiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 03-25-2021, 12:48 PM   #6
KRatcliff
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 769
Likes: 75
Liked 534 Times in 143 Posts
Default Re: F.I. fuel pressure theories

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan Weiss View Post
Has anyone looked at say running the 42 lb injector at say 55 PSI which would have a reduced pulse width / duty cycle verses the 36 lb injector at 50 PSI?

Stan
Yes, that is definitely the right direction based on our experience. Larger injectors, higher FP (50 psi minimum), and reduced pulse width.


YMMV.
KRatcliff is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 03-25-2021, 02:17 PM   #7
Stan Weiss
Senior Member
 
Stan Weiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Liked 734 Times in 385 Posts
Default Re: F.I. fuel pressure theories

Quote:
Originally Posted by KRatcliff View Post
Yes, that is definitely the right direction based on our experience. Larger injectors, higher FP (50 psi minimum), and reduced pulse width.


YMMV.

Does your ECU let you control an individual injector's flow position in the 720 degree cycle?

Stan
Stan Weiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2021, 04:45 PM   #8
Bobby Fazio
VIP Member
 
Bobby Fazio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 1,453
Liked 4,379 Times in 502 Posts
Default Re: F.I. fuel pressure theories

I've been wondering this also. An oversized injector to get down to a low pulse width duty cycle? This is beneficial if you can phase the injector to spray at optimal time. Or a smaller injector with higher pressure for higher mist and atomization but it stays open longer and could be spraying at a closed valve.
__________________
'65 Mustang SS/L & L/SA
DriverInterviews.com | App.DragInsights.com
Bobby Fazio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2021, 05:55 PM   #9
Pierce Jones
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Chatham, ON. Canada
Posts: 19
Likes: 15
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: F.I. fuel pressure theories

Looking at a data log, my injectors (24 lbs/hr) are open 7.7msec (88% duty cycle) at 7000RPM (42 deg/msec). The intake has 308 deg dur @ .020”. So injectors are open 323 degrees of rotation and in my case spraying at a closed intake valve.

Not sure if any would be gained by a 36 lbs/hr etc.
Pierce Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2021, 09:28 PM   #10
e vassar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 382
Likes: 67
Liked 271 Times in 107 Posts
Default Re: F.I. fuel pressure theories

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan Weiss View Post
Does your ECU let you control an individual injector's flow position in the 720 degree cycle?

Stan
I think so its a big stuff 3 i had it programmed for my car (99 Camaro) and had it installed First time at the track black smoke was rolling out at idle and was trying to load up. I haven't learned how to tune it yet so i turned fuel pressure down to about 42psi to clean it up. So my thought was to change to 36lb injectors so I could turn it back up....but if I can cure the problem by shortening the pulse width.....whats the difference?
e vassar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.