|
|
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 297
Likes: 2
Liked 33 Times in 24 Posts
|
![]()
And do you have any more info on where this information came from?? I found it, thanks for the heads up, boy this is sure going to shake things up
Last edited by Maverick; 02-10-2022 at 08:50 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Golden Beach Maryland
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 55
Liked 262 Times in 124 Posts
|
![]()
About time. Just made a bunch of back halfed cars more competitive.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Dela-where?
Posts: 2,185
Likes: 1,147
Liked 1,854 Times in 573 Posts
|
![]()
The tree never should have been changed in the first place! we got screwed because of a bunch of crying pros
there was a lot of money spent to make cars hit these numbers. Corvette roadster’s became the norm after the 3.70 tree
__________________
KEITH MAYERS 2-1/2 X somebody Still many X nobody |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 246
Likes: 155
Liked 126 Times in 66 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond Hill GA (and Port Ludlow WA)
Posts: 4,273
Likes: 2,310
Liked 3,099 Times in 954 Posts
|
![]()
Wonder how many racers spent a lot of $ over the winter trying to make their cars hit the quicker tree or make their back half cars competitive in S/G? If they were considering the change it should have been done with months of notice, NHRA is so out of touch with sportsman racers it’s pathetic.
__________________
Jim Carter 2340 Super Stock 2340 SST/2340 Stock Set another place at the table |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 246
Likes: 155
Liked 126 Times in 66 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|