|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Santa Fe TEXAS
Posts: 109
Likes: 2
Liked 58 Times in 16 Posts
|
![]()
Trying to see what the general consensus is on recommended gear ratio would be in conjunction with tire size.
396 / 325 Automatic 3 speed 2.75 low 4:88 or 4:56? 92.5 “ or 94” Hoosier radial? Would it be the same for 360/340hp (bigger cam) as well? Wanting to hear about real world tests/results? Help appreciated. Thanks in advance.
__________________
Overkill is Under-rated |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 2,732
Liked 2,398 Times in 679 Posts
|
![]()
4.56 and either tire size would be my suggestion.
I think the 325 / 396 is not a super high rev combo.
__________________
John Irving 741 Stock 741 Super Stock |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Fishers Indiana
Posts: 58
Likes: 9
Liked 23 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
Find a chassis dyne throw it on there see where the motor is actually make power and torque . Unless you your combo is built identical to others running the same stuff you are just guessing where it wants to be . I would think someone would chime in that runs that combo I know there are a lot of them out there
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: tomsriver nj
Posts: 470
Likes: 70
Liked 203 Times in 82 Posts
|
![]()
There's only 100-150 RPM difference between the 92.5 & the 94 .
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Belmont N.S. Canada
Posts: 473
Likes: 246
Liked 163 Times in 71 Posts
|
![]()
Mine likes 4.33 in F weight, 4.56 in G weight. They don’t have a ton of RPM on tap. With the 350hp combo 4.56 would likely be okay in the lighter class, but the cam doesnt seem to increase RPM range by much.
__________________
Chris Chapman 1969 Chevelle NHRA F-G/SA 1090 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|