|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Noblesville,In
Posts: 108
Likes: 7
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
|
![]()
Let the Bitching begin! Lol
__________________
SS/AH 328X |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 911
Likes: 1,123
Liked 673 Times in 200 Posts
|
![]()
The aluminum head is now accepted, but with an additional 10 horsepower added. But, they are better for repair if needed.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Near Portland TN
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 3,871
Liked 902 Times in 237 Posts
|
![]()
Like in Super Stock the aluminum head for the 428 Pontiac from Edelbrock has to have a part number on them with the NHRA logo will this be the case??
__________________
Don Kennedy 7701 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Western PA
Posts: 453
Likes: 13
Liked 273 Times in 142 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I did see last night the Indy 426-SR was also approved for S/S only. These are the old Canfield castings...which were essentially an aluminum version of an original head. Canfield introduced them in the mid-late 2000's, and went out of business not long after. Indy sells them as a 200cc intake port though, so they cannot be used out of the box without work. How long will this last though? The last time NHRA approved aluminum heads for AH, they rescinded it about 3 days later. Last edited by Steve Stasko; 10-12-2022 at 10:37 AM. Reason: Added photo. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Liked 216 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
What does a 559 M-2 head look like?
I havent seen anything but the M-1's. All those edelbrock heads have the wrong ex valve angle. I assume thats a typo. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Western PA
Posts: 453
Likes: 13
Liked 273 Times in 142 Posts
|
![]()
I didn't even realize they approved the Victor Jr head also and I looked right at that note. You're correct, the exhaust angle is altered 1.5 degrees from stock on those. That's why it didn't even cross my mind to check those part numbers.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 451
Likes: 147
Liked 119 Times in 40 Posts
|
![]()
Dyno, someplace I still have a copy of the letter/petition that went around 5 or 6 years ago!! It has taken a while
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 911
Likes: 1,123
Liked 673 Times in 200 Posts
|
![]()
Lloyd and I put that letter together and sent it to NHRA. It was rejected and I thought that idea was gone. I have been told the aluminum head would always make less power, but they would be repairable. That was the concept/reason for the aluminum head. The other plus side is that the cylinder head experts would prefer to work on an aluminum head over the cast iron head.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pukwana SD
Posts: 860
Likes: 554
Liked 99 Times in 49 Posts
|
![]()
Why not give aluminum heads to all engines ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 3,579
Liked 7,650 Times in 1,726 Posts
|
![]()
Here's a better question (for me anyway)!
Why not take away all of the aluminum cylinder heads from engines that never had them? I doubt that there will ever be an aluminum head for a 6 cylinder Chevy or a 301 Pontiac! From where I'm sitting it looks like NHRA is discriminating against me!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|