|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Does AHFS need to work more? | |||
| Leave the AHFS alone and keep doing things as we have been. |
   
|
34 | 37.36% |
| Adjust the rules of the AHFS in an effort to more quickly fix fast combinations |
  
|
57 | 62.64% |
| Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
11-29-2022, 02:49 PM
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Liked 31 Times in 7 Posts
|
AHFS Change
I frequent this page often, but I do not engage on here as we all know how individuals can and do react on these sites. The majority of the time the threads go off topic rather quickly and then bickering occurs amongst people and it all goes to hell in a handbasket. I noticed there was a thread mentioning a "survey" was sent out about the AHFS sent out in the last week or so by SRAC members. I reached out to one of the SRAC members to get some substance as to what the survey was/is.
After understanding that not all SRAC members provided a survey to their ACTIVE racers, I thought I would take a the gamble and see if there could be any valuable feedback from the patrons here. NHRA is in discussion about making changes to the AHFS. The general question is, do you think the AHFS needs to work more? Meaning does it need to hit combinations of cars quicker and make parity adjustments? In the simplest form the answers needed are: A-leave the AHFS alone and keep doing things as we have been. B-adjust the rules of the AHFS in an effort to more quickly fix fast combinations. Tyler Wudarczyk Last edited by tylerw5089; 11-29-2022 at 06:11 PM. |
|
|
|
11-29-2022, 03:40 PM
|
#2 |
|
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,611
Likes: 1,896
Liked 10,649 Times in 2,208 Posts
|
Re: AHFS Change
The survey I took had four questions on it.
|
|
|
|
|
11-29-2022, 03:57 PM
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Golden Colorado
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 6 Posts
|
Re: AHFS Change
What were the four Questions? Thanks
Norman Warling M/SA 5020 |
|
|
|
|
11-29-2022, 05:07 PM
|
#4 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 2,104
Liked 2,272 Times in 528 Posts
|
Re: AHFS Change
1 – No mineshaft: already accepted for 2023- Do you want the mine shaft rule for 2023 Reply Yes or No
2 – Indy not exempt: Do you want the AHFS to be on or off for the 2023 US Nationals Reply Yes on or No off 3 – Change the -1.2xx immediate change to -1.4xx immediate change: Do you want the automatic Horse power to be on or off. Please reply: On or Off 1.20 or 1.30 or 1.40 4 – Change -.350 and slower not included to –.649 and slower not included in avg’s for increases. Change what counts in the AHFS averages from -.350 under to -.649 under Please reply No Change or Change
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 |
|
|
| Liked |
|
11-29-2022, 05:26 PM
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Las Vegas, Nv
Posts: 854
Likes: 255
Liked 1,306 Times in 397 Posts
|
Re: AHFS Change
So some got 4 question some got 2 and then there were none. Perfect!
Paul Haszlauer 7019 C/SA |
|
|
|
| Liked |
|
11-29-2022, 06:13 PM
|
#6 | |
|
Live Reporter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethlehem , PA -Christmas City , USA
Posts: 4,901
Likes: 402
Liked 1,850 Times in 378 Posts
 |
Re: AHFS Change
Quote:
__________________
Jack Matyas 1547 FS/C 2015 Camaro COPO # 62- 2012 Camaro Convertible COPO |
|
|
|
|
| Liked |
|
11-29-2022, 06:14 PM
|
#7 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Liked 31 Times in 7 Posts
|
Re: AHFS Change
Sorry all, I had the 4 that Darren added. My thought was at the very least let's see if change is even desired. If it is not, then showing the possible changes doesn't seem to be necessary.
Tyler Wudarczyk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
