|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 47
Likes: 5
Liked 7 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
I saw a photo of a '64 Chevelle running 396/375 in GT/FA I believe. The GT concept has always eluded me. Can some clarify this for me?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 620
Liked 1,946 Times in 587 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
So if you have a 64 Chevelle and have an engine out of a 70 Chevrolet and that would be legal in a GT class
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Near Portland TN
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 3,876
Liked 904 Times in 237 Posts
|
![]()
A Racer is allowed to run any Engine combination in a new or older body style, The Body remains the same but the updated engine HP is the same as if the engine came into a combination from the factory
__________________
Don Kennedy 7701 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 47
Likes: 5
Liked 7 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Okay. So, disregarding if it would be competitive or not, I could use a 396/375 in a '78 Malibu Wagon?
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 620
Liked 1,946 Times in 587 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I also think the 396/375 is a stick only combo and you have to run the correct transmission for the engine combo.
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS Last edited by Mike Pearson; 08-10-2023 at 12:21 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 47
Likes: 5
Liked 7 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks for the clarification, guys. I was under the impression that GT was only for later model cars. Say '82 or later Camaros.and cars like that. It never occurred to me earlier models would figure in also.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 620
Liked 1,946 Times in 587 Posts
|
![]()
Originally it was that way. 1980 and newer only. Several years ago that was changed to any year.
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 894
Likes: 687
Liked 1,034 Times in 368 Posts
|
![]()
I think originally the reason for the GT classes was an attempt to get guys to build the new anemic cars coming out of Detroit into race cars. The 60's cars were so much better and no one wanted to built these smog motors. Detroit wanted their new cars going down the track. So they let them put the old engines in the new cars. Boy, how things have changed.
__________________
Jeff Niceswanger 3740 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#9 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Thibodaux, LA
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 330
Liked 1,028 Times in 222 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
If you take a '69 Camaro and stick an '82 Camaro motor in it...GT
__________________
Brett Candies 4192 Stock/SS God Bless America |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Maryland USA
Posts: 534
Likes: 134
Liked 250 Times in 90 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|