HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-29-2009, 09:13 AM   #31
Harry 6674
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

Quote:
Originally Posted by RAY ADAM View Post
john kelly im with you. robbie shaw in my eyes must of help take weight out of the car thats why he wants it to die. sounds like a friend trying to take the heat of sorenson.there is no doubt in my mind sorenson knows somebody that was able to crush this.
WHY WONT SORENSON SPEAK UP ON THIS WEB SITE???????????

HE'S GUILTY BOTTOM LINE.
Why should they even try to explain what they were doing if anything on this site against a bunch of squirrels who weren't there and have already found them guilty? I have a real good idea the value they put on their motors and I can't believe they would drain the water than drive back to the pits unless it was real close.
Harry 6674 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2009, 12:27 PM   #32
s10stocker
Junior Member
 
s10stocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Thibodaux, LA
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes View Post
that would be solved if they all showed up at the Cajun Sports Nationals, Wesley would catch em
This would have never happened on Mr. Wesleys watch period. He may be very strict but very fair.
__________________
George Roussel Jr. 4262 1996 S10 n-o-p/sa
s10stocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2009, 04:55 PM   #33
Mickey Whaley
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Wink Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

what if i went 1.408 under then just before the scales i took a 2 pound **** and was 1 pound under weight would it count? Or would they throw the **** on the scales with me and make it legal?
Mickey Whaley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2009, 05:48 PM   #34
Jim Cassels
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cairo, Ga.
Posts: 90
Likes: 2
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

Micky, you are full of it. Brandon says hi.
Jim
Jim Cassels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2009, 06:44 PM   #35
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mickey Whaley View Post
what if i went 1.408 under then just before the scales i took a 2 pound **** and was 1 pound under weight would it count? Or would they throw the **** on the scales with me and make it legal?
Mickey,I'd suggest you carry a doggie bag to deposit the poo and present it at the scales as ballast.You may be tossed for "loose" ballast though.
Through course of this debate am I correct that when the scales are open EVERYONE is supposed to weigh?Did Sorensen go over the scales?If he didn't isn't that a one year vacation?
Just once I'd like to see someone who is bounced get on here and admit they broke a rule.Nah it's better to play victim.

Ed F.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2009, 07:14 PM   #36
bigshow2966
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: chicago
Posts: 653
Likes: 667
Liked 178 Times in 54 Posts
Default Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

Does anyone have any solid PROOF that he drained the water? If so was it presented to the NHRA? If not, why not?

He did scale and came up light.
bigshow2966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2009, 08:35 PM   #37
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigshow2966 View Post
Does anyone have any solid PROOF that he drained the water? If so was it presented to the NHRA? If not, why not?

He did scale and came up light.
Thank you.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2009, 09:29 PM   #38
Mickey Whaley
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Wink Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

Dwa
Mickey Whaley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2009, 12:51 AM   #39
bsa633
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

If they just could come up with an explanation in wich circumstanses this 1.40 deal does apply (or dosen't) .and in what divisions...then racers would know...or would they?
bsa633 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.