|
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bayou Country, Louisiana
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Last year we used 1.00 as the factor which made it real eazy to calculate in my head. We are trying to get CompuLink to allow us to change the CIC factor with imput, rather than "hard wired" into the computer systems at .50.
We will make the call before 1st round. How about getting it started? What would the driver's like to see? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
How about 1.40 under the current index?
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) Last edited by Adger Smith; 02-01-2010 at 10:18 AM. Reason: sp |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Sounds like a plan to me.
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
1.40 under the new indexes, may not be too many getting hit with the CIC.
![]()
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]()
Sounds like no one gets hit EVER at that level. Kind of like NHRAs AHFS. Needs to be at where Least under class winner level to make it hit everyone running or .1 or .2 lower so Being Quickest in country is benefited...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|