HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-25-2010, 09:01 AM   #21
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Cool Re: Bo Butner New Ride 2010 Mustang D/SA

It could be done....look at all of the "Kit CARs" and glass bodied (home built) street rods running around with assigned vins from the DMV. They are not emmisions tested or have air bags much less 5 MPH bumpers, etc. It could be the same type of registration and street rod tags assigned to them.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2010, 11:19 AM   #22
B Aceves
Member
 
B Aceves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
Liked 7 Times in 4 Posts
Smile Re: Bo Butner New Ride 2010 Mustang D/SA

Quote:
Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN View Post
That is EXACTLY one reason why these limited production and incomplete cars should be classified as SUPER STOCK ONLY and not stockers. No one said they should never be allowed to race in a class legal catagory....just not as a stocker like the limited production, non emission and safety tested and incomplete '68 HEMI 'Cudas and Darts were and are classified to this day.
Better yet what about the old F/X classes...


Bob Aceves
#746 E/SA
A&M motorsports
__________________
Bob Aceves,
746 E/SA
A&M motorsports
B Aceves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2010, 11:40 AM   #23
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Thumbs up Re: Bo Butner New Ride 2010 Mustang D/SA

Quote:
Originally Posted by B Aceves View Post
Better yet what about the old F/X classes...


Bob Aceves
#746 E/SA
A&M motorsports
One reason for the F/X classes was because either the cars were not built to current at that time federal standards (or not enough of them had been built yet or ever built) plus some could not qualify for any stock or S/S class (2% altered wheel base MoPars, OHC Cammer Mustangs (rear wheels were moved up 3 inches), etc.) no mater how many were built. Thank you Farmer where ever you are.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2010, 11:40 AM   #24
John Quinn
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bison, KS
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Bo Butner New Ride 2010 Mustang D/SA

[QUOTE=Billy Nees;183980]
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Quinn View Post
I could tag the car in colorado as a home built and get plates but I would probably have to put mufflers on it.

I wish you a lot of luck with that!
I can't wait till some "stupid rich kid" buys one, brings it home and tries to tag it. That should be a good lawsuit.
I am a "Stupid kid" but alas not rich so this is just a mental exercise for me.

As X-Tech pointed out, home built and kit cars have their VIN assigned by the state. It couldn't be titled as a Ford product because they did not assign a VIN.

In Colorado you need receipts for the parts and have to pass a visual inspection they then assign a VIN and attach it to the vehicle.

Floyd, there a stiff penalty for transfering a VIN plate it would not be worth prison time.

If you have to sign an agreement not to title it when you purchase from Ford then the original purchaser could not do this.
John Quinn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2010, 03:40 PM   #25
Bill Howell
Sponsor
 
Bill Howell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 315
Likes: 28
Liked 218 Times in 61 Posts
Default Re: Bo Butner New Ride 2010 Mustang D/SA

I do not know if all states are the same, but the 2010 CJ Mustangs do have a serial number and do get titled here in South Carolina.
__________________

Bill Howell 2059 STK
Bill Howell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2010, 02:59 PM   #26
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
Default Re: Bo Butner New Ride 2010 Mustang D/SA

Quote:
Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN View Post
One reason for the F/X classes was because either the cars were not built to current at that time federal standards (or not enough of them had been built yet or ever built) plus some could not qualify for any stock or S/S class (2% altered wheel base MoPars, OHC Cammer Mustangs (rear wheels were moved up 3 inches), etc.) no mater how many were built. Thank you Farmer where ever you are.

Bingo !

There's the new class designation for all of these so called "50-build" cars without vins and with "crate " engines that no-one can buy on Monday and register to drive on highways on Sundays.

....oops...or is that win on Sunday-buy on Monday. ?

"Factory Experimental" could not fit these new machines any better in definition.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2010, 03:25 PM   #27
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Bo Butner New Ride 2010 Mustang D/SA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Pagano View Post
You could register it in OK, they dont have titles like other states do.
Hmmm, I have titles for all six of my vehicles.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.