|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Im thinking about trying a brodix dual plane rec port intake,in place of oval port rpm air gap, anybody been down this road before? The combo is a 460 hyd cam,closed chamber oval heads,no port work ,flat top.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,124
Likes: 1,581
Liked 1,874 Times in 422 Posts
|
![]()
Why?
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Less low to mid range and more higher rpm power...Lookin for ways to go faster ...also we got a no port rule in the class ...thought the rec port might be better as cast...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,124
Likes: 1,581
Liked 1,874 Times in 422 Posts
|
![]()
Then why not a single plane oval port?
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I have heard of people doing this and they claim to make power beyond that of the oval/oval combo. I have yet to see any back to back results; but Speedtalk has several threads on the subject. If your combo is as mild as it sounds I don't know how much you would gain.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,124
Likes: 1,581
Liked 1,874 Times in 422 Posts
|
![]()
You'll find that most modern dual planes of the same pattern are relatively equal. I'd say there's considerably more power to be found elsewhere.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|