HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-07-2013, 07:36 PM   #11
Jeff Lee
VIP Member
 
Jeff Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: GT Combo?

It wouldn't upset the AMC racers (maybe the cruise night dudes but BFD). But a 290 AMC is better than a 318 4bbl, and a 360 AMC is better than any 340 or 360 AMC. Maybe not the 340 T/A, but maybe yes.
And the world waits for proof....
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX
Jeff Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2013, 09:35 PM   #12
Chris1529
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 6
Liked 70 Times in 29 Posts
Default Re: GT Combo?

a new 392 hemi may spice an AMX up a little bit.
__________________
Chris Bowman
The Mountain State Mustang
1984 Mustang GT350
Chris1529 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2013, 10:23 PM   #13
Jeff Lee
VIP Member
 
Jeff Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: GT Combo?

what class and weight would that have to be?
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX
Jeff Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2013, 10:13 AM   #14
Chris1529
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 6
Liked 70 Times in 29 Posts
Default Re: GT Combo?

D/S...lol.

on a more serious note though, a 318 like Sheehan or Volkman run in their GT cars would probably work well in an AMC too.
__________________
Chris Bowman
The Mountain State Mustang
1984 Mustang GT350
Chris1529 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2013, 12:01 PM   #15
Greg Reimer 7376
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 172
Liked 705 Times in 219 Posts
Cool Re: GT Combo?

When I worked for the Los Angeles County Mechanical Department in the early-mid 1980's, we had Hornets, afew Gremlins, and 360,390,and 401 powered Matadors. They all had a Chrysler Torque Flite trans-a 727 or a 904. Made you wonder what kind of possibilities exist. Now, with the merger,does that mean we will see a Hemi powered Gremlin in SS/AA?
Greg Reimer 7376 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2013, 10:21 PM   #16
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: GT Combo?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris1529 View Post
a new 392 hemi may spice an AMX up a little bit.
That old 392 would be heavier than the rest of the car.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2013, 10:58 PM   #17
Jeff Lee
VIP Member
 
Jeff Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: GT Combo?

Ed,
He said "new hemi" which are in the new SRT's.
I would agree, the new Chrysler, post 2008, would be interesting GT cars in a 97" wheel base AMX. And those '73 Hornets are a pretty slippery looking vehicle and I think they look kinda cool; with the right paint job.
On auto transmissions, the doors wide open as AMC used the FMX (Ford source), Turbo 400, TF 727 & 904, all with AMC specific bellhousings.
Turbo 400 was a Jeep truck item so I'm not sure that is legal but if it is, does that then allow a t-200 metric?
And I'd personally take a 290 AMC Super Stock over a 318 Super Stock.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX
Jeff Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.