HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-06-2013, 11:16 AM   #21
Dan Fahey
VIP Member
 
Dan Fahey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock Challange - Ohio May 2014

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Wright View Post
We had to run stock spring pressure too. General Kinetics cam was my fastest. Spring eater. GM springs = two races. TRW springs = three races, sometimes four. My engine ('56 Chevy) was the 2-4bl 225 hp Corvette engine, solid lifters. The GK cam used .003" lash. Last pass of the day, check the lash before loading up to verify everything was up to temp.
YEAH had a General Kinetics cam too ..wow are they still in business?

My 1969 Impala 350/255 with a Woodro Built engine had a Lunati Cam he recommended.
Someone stole that engine.

At any rate that car is going for a full "cost too much money" restoration.
But it has been a Stocker since I bought it from Bob LaSala in 1975.

Budd Rowe built up a engine and think it has a cam from the 70's.
Only made 371 hp on the dyno. Used a set of GM Pinks Rods.
Bob Bender says he has a cam that I maybe interested in.

Glad it is a frame off because that frame had cracks in it.
Mostly small spots and needed patching in the Axle and Spring Pirtch areas.

D
Dan Fahey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2013, 10:14 AM   #22
gbur
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Spotsylvania,Va
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Pure Stock Challange - Ohio May 2014

No I don't think GK has been around in quite some time. As far as spring eaters, My old E car (68 302 Camaro) cam Dynamics cam would destroy springs every third pass. Out it came
gbur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2013, 10:17 PM   #23
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock Challange - Ohio May 2014

Quote:
Originally Posted by gbur View Post
No I don't think GK has been around in quite some time. As far as spring eaters, My old E car (68 302 Camaro) cam Dynamics cam would destroy springs every third pass. Out it came
That would be tough to afford, besides the work. I'd pull it too. Dang!
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2013, 04:33 PM   #24
Dan Fahey
VIP Member
 
Dan Fahey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock Challange - Ohio May 2014

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Wright View Post
That would be tough to afford, besides the work. I'd pull it too. Dang!
I have heard a lot about Springs getting eaten up by the Blueprinted Cams.
Back then we had to use Stock Spring pressure.
Never had a problem with the 929 Chevy cams for the 350/250/255/300

What was happening ?

D
Dan Fahey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2013, 06:07 PM   #25
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock Challange - Ohio May 2014

Only spintron I ever heard about back then was the one Buddy Morrison built . "spin fixture" is what I remember them calling it. Commercially built units people buy now are powered by electric motors. What they built was a SBC (no pistons) powered by a 460" Ford engine, running at a 2-1 overdrive. 5K for the 460" was 10k (DUH! LOL) for the sbc mockup, which is about what guys were turning them back then. I don't remember if they loaned it to Cam Dynamics, or Comp. But, that was the first time I heard of valve springs smoking. Think it was Gordon Holloway telling me about seeing that. It was during valve float.

Harmonics was killing stock valve springs. That is all we were allowed to run.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013, 11:09 AM   #26
Dan Fahey
VIP Member
 
Dan Fahey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock Challange - Ohio May 2014

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Wright View Post
Only spintron I ever heard about back then was the one Buddy Morrison built . "spin fixture" is what I remember them calling it. Commercially built units people buy now are powered by electric motors. What they built was a SBC (no pistons) powered by a 460" Ford engine, running at a 2-1 overdrive. 5K for the 460" was 10k (DUH! LOL) for the sbc mockup, which is about what guys were turning them back then. I don't remember if they loaned it to Cam Dynamics, or Comp. But, that was the first time I heard of valve springs smoking. Think it was Gordon Holloway telling me about seeing that. It was during valve float.

Harmonics was killing stock valve springs. That is all we were allowed to run.
So the Harmonics were hurting the Springs or were they heating up changing the yield and losing spring pressure or both?

D
Dan Fahey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 05:18 PM   #27
Mike Taylor 3601
VIP Member
 
Mike Taylor 3601's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Somerset,Ky
Posts: 1,372
Likes: 354
Liked 307 Times in 103 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock Challange - Ohio May 2014

Here's my pure stocker picture Dan
Mike Taylor 3601
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	racecar @ clay city.jpg
Views:	240
Size:	57.6 KB
ID:	19626  

Last edited by Mike Taylor 3601; 06-14-2013 at 05:23 PM.
Mike Taylor 3601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.