HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-12-2013, 11:35 PM   #21
Jeff Lee
VIP Member
 
Jeff Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Ford Maverick combo

Quote:
Originally Posted by partsbob67 View Post
Must be same year and make as car used, aftermarket NHRA- accepted cylinder blocks permitted. section 10a page 3 in the stock section.
Engine must be same year and make as car used. That means it has to have all the specs listed by NHRA for the year / make and model claimed. You can put a 1984 Ford 302 block in the '71 Maverick as long as it meets the bore / stroke specifications.

Note there is a comma separating the two thoughts.

Aftermarket NHRA accepted cylinder blocks permitted. That means if a Dart, World Products, etc., block is what you want to use it is OK only if approved by NHRA.

Use some common sense. Why would NHRA want a '71 (only) OEM block in your '71 Maverick? And then also allow an aftermarket non-OEM block?
Some factory production blocks have no external markings on them indicating what year the block was manufactured. It doesn't make sense.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX
Jeff Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2013, 08:16 AM   #22
7423
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Ford Maverick combo

It is quite interesting how experienced racers can read the bible and walk away with completely different and opposing ideas of what was printed. Just shows how vague the rule book really is.

Shout out to PartsBob, see ya in Vegas next weekend ??
7423 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2013, 01:40 PM   #23
partsbob67
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: rohnert park,ca
Posts: 414
Likes: 11
Liked 79 Times in 11 Posts
Default Re: Ford Maverick combo

see you there buddy!
__________________
bob beals 7244
partsbob67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2013, 03:39 PM   #24
Jeff Lee
VIP Member
 
Jeff Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Ford Maverick combo

Quote:
Originally Posted by 7423 View Post
It is quite interesting how experienced racers can read the bible and walk away with completely different and opposing ideas of what was printed. Just shows how vague the rule book really is.

Shout out to PartsBob, see ya in Vegas next weekend ??
The rule book could be written for every possible issue, it would be 10" thick and still it wouldn't be read or understood by many. Case in point, Obamacare is 2000+ pages and those that wrote it and those that must follow it one year after still haven't figured it out.

If NHRA wanted you to have a 1971 casting 302 block, and nothing else, it would be clearly stated. The engine blueprint guide, the class guide & the rule book are a threesome that are used together. You can't just use one of the three and hope to accomplish something.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX
Jeff Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2013, 09:59 PM   #25
Dan Fahey
VIP Member
 
Dan Fahey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
Default Re: Ford Maverick combo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lee View Post
The rule book could be written for every possible issue, it would be 10" thick and still it wouldn't be read or understood by many. Case in point, Obamacare is 2000+ pages and those that wrote it and those that must follow it one year after still haven't figured it out.

If NHRA wanted you to have a 1971 casting 302 block, and nothing else, it would be clearly stated. The engine blueprint guide, the class guide & the rule book are a threesome that are used together. You can't just use one of the three and hope to accomplish something.
The you should blame the 20 republican authors.
Which include Jim DeMint, Grassley, HW Bush.
They wrote it to keep insurance companies relevant and profits high for the shareholders.
Dan Fahey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2013, 01:00 PM   #26
Damn Yankee
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 98
Likes: 3
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Ford Maverick combo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Fahey View Post
The you should blame the 20 republican authors.
Which include Jim DeMint, Grassley, HW Bush.
They wrote it to keep insurance companies relevant and profits high for the shareholders.
The Dumbocrats controlled the White House, Senate, and the House and had sole control of Obama care and they still turned out a soup sandwich of a bill. I remember Nancy Pelosi telling us the bill had to be signed, so we could all read it and see what's in it. It's such a fine POS that all the Unions are up in arms and demanding it be repealed. Dan u need to wake up.

Now back to the thread at hand, yes Maverick's make great Stocker's, now throw a Kuntz built1968 3024V with a Jerico in that thing and go run some high 9's
Damn Yankee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2013, 01:02 PM   #27
Joe Toller
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lewistown, Montana
Posts: 550
Likes: 78
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: Ford Maverick combo

Damn politics anyway

If I had an unlimited budget and couldnt keep my race car ADD in check, I would have a 302 Maverick on the trailer right now!

Nevermind, I brought one home

Last edited by Joe Toller; 10-12-2013 at 08:58 PM.
Joe Toller is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.