HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-02-2014, 08:16 PM   #151
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Beard View Post
Not "some". *I'm* the one that brought it up, and I specifically said first that I thought that 8-sec cars belonged in Super Stock, and I also said that if I continue to race my 15-sec Stocker against 150 mph cars I would choose to put a roll bar in the car. I haven't started any petition to NHRA or anything. Sheesh.

I guess you could go by bracket rules and not wear a helmet, firejacket or fire pants in a 15-sec Stocker, too, but I choose to wear them. I felt perfectly safe, too, right up until a car went sideways in front of me in my lane at 140+. I was just bringing up some self-preservation thoughts. To each their own.
When I sold my Gremlin to Eric Merryfield I asked him to have a rollbar installed in the car
as his daughter and son were going to drive it.He went the extra mile and had a cage and chassis connectors put in it. I would have done it if I kept the car. It's unnerving to have one of the new cars blow by you at around 60 mph. It's only a matter of time till one of them takes out a lower class stocker trying to make it close at the stripe.
It entails buying a jacket,belts etc. but hey how much is your life worth to you?
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2014, 09:37 PM   #152
jmantle
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Black Creek, BC Canada
Posts: 331
Likes: 79
Liked 172 Times in 81 Posts
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Caughlin View Post
One thing you Stocker guys might want to consider is unintended consequences. A scenario that I could easily see happening is for NHRA to say "We have listened to our Stock class racers and per their request, we are creating a new separate eliminator for cars newer than 2008." What they are not going to mention is that a proportional amount of the payout and a good chunk of the contingiency money will be going with it. You don't really think that NHRA is going to add a new elimanator and just add the money accordingly? Also, dig out some of your older Natl Dragsters and look how contingiency money has been redistributed over the last few years, money has been added for the new cars at the expense of the older combinations. Don't be fooled by press releases about how the manufacturers are adding contingiency, it's all being feed into the new cars and dropped from the older cars. I race in SS and it doesn't seem to be as big of a deal for us but Stock needs to be careful about what they wish for, I think you guys are being set up.

Jim Caughlin
SS 6019
Jim, I think what most stock racers would like to see is put the factory hot rods in SS, be it FX or whatever, and add the real stockers to the guide and let the AHFS work. I know Jeff Teuton managed to get Chrysler to add a few to the guide, I'd like to see NHRA pressure Ford and GM to do the same.

Jim Mantle
V/SA 6632
jmantle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2014, 09:53 PM   #153
Pedigo Perf
Member
 
Pedigo Perf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wichita Ks
Posts: 383
Likes: 70
Liked 30 Times in 17 Posts
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Caughlin View Post
One thing you Stocker guys might want to consider is unintended consequences. A scenario that I could easily see happening is for NHRA to say "We have listened to our Stock class racers and per their request, we are creating a new separate eliminator for cars newer than 2008." What they are not going to mention is that a proportional amount of the payout and a good chunk of the contingiency money will be going with it. You don't really think that NHRA is going to add a new elimanator and just add the money accordingly? Also, dig out some of your older Natl Dragsters and look how contingiency money has been redistributed over the last few years, money has been added for the new cars at the expense of the older combinations. Don't be fooled by press releases about how the manufacturers are adding contingiency, it's all being feed into the new cars and dropped from the older cars. I race in SS and it doesn't seem to be as big of a deal for us but Stock needs to be careful about what they wish for, I think you guys are being set up.

Jim Caughlin
SS 6019

Bill Lumbergh: Great.
Dom Portwood: So, uh, Milton has been let go?
Bob Slydell: Well, just a second there, professor. We, uh, we fixed the *glitch*. So he won't be receiving a paycheck anymore, so it'll just work itself out naturally.
Bob Porter: We always like to avoid confrontation, whenever possible. Problem is solved from your end.
Pedigo Perf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 08:53 AM   #154
ss wannabee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

FS Fan has a nice post and I'll have to re-read it...Not trying to beat you up on the details,
BUT I think the LAST carbureted Domestic production-line car MAY have been the 1990
Olds full-size Custom Cruiser wagon with the 307 engine...(and Quadrajet)....

Think the rest of the Big-3 had switched to TBI and Port-Fuel Injection by then...not sure
why Olds hung-on with the 4-bbl engine.....
ss wannabee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 09:21 AM   #155
Keith 944
VIP Member
 
Keith 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Dela-where?
Posts: 2,195
Likes: 1,162
Liked 1,882 Times in 578 Posts
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedigo Perf View Post
Bill Lumbergh: Great.
Dom Portwood: So, uh, Milton has been let go?
Bob Slydell: Well, just a second there, professor. We, uh, we fixed the *glitch*. So he won't be receiving a paycheck anymore, so it'll just work itself out naturally.
Bob Porter: We always like to avoid confrontation, whenever possible. Problem is solved from your end.
one thing not mentioned here, he eventually burned the place to the ground!
lmao
__________________
KEITH MAYERS
2-1/2 X somebody
Still many X nobody
Keith 944 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 09:25 AM   #156
Bill Diehl
Member
 
Bill Diehl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 311
Likes: 2
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

That CJ stocker, with the same engine platform and 60 more cubes, almost 15 to 1, 650 roller, cnc modern heads with 150 more cfm, and twice the throttle bore opening only makes 100 more HP than mine?

I might as well leave my half finished Boss in the garage then.

Don't get me wrong, I like the new tech just as much as the next guy, but lets get real here. I would like to show the world how smart I am and qualify at the top of the pack too, but how is that going to happen if they don't take a "hit" like I would if I did?

carry on
Bill Diehl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 09:47 AM   #157
Bunkster
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Liked 43 Times in 10 Posts
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack McCarthy View Post
....i am sure glad roy WANTED to be part of the 60th Big Fiasco...
Too many don't recall, or aren't aware, of the stock final in 1986.
Bunkster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 10:22 AM   #158
Wayne W
Junior Member
 
Wayne W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 91
Likes: 8
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

How about. New cars in Stock and older cars in Jr. Stock ??

Just a thought.
Wayne W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 10:35 AM   #159
rickseeman
Member
 
rickseeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Stuttgart, AR
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Blackley View Post
You didn't buy that thru the showroom. You bought that as a part number from the parts department and that was the whole point you missed. There has never been any of these that have been available off the showroom floor.
BS. I saw several there, Baytown Dodge had 2. I got one of them.

The new cars are under factored and that's not right.
rickseeman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 11:05 AM   #160
Rose Racing
Member
 
Rose Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 353
Likes: 95
Liked 226 Times in 74 Posts
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunkster View Post
Too many don't recall, or aren't aware, of the stock final in 1986.
fill us in please
Rose Racing is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.