|
![]() |
#51 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 712
Liked 1,604 Times in 583 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
What I was stating is the air cleaner assembly is not the reason why the car is fast. It goes fast because the hard work put not only on the engine, but also the car. This particular air cleaner assembly does not have a ram air effect; it draws air from the bottom of the air cleaner. Even my son's V6, 1997 Firebird had this air cleaner assembly. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 143
Likes: 3
Liked 80 Times in 29 Posts
|
![]()
Like many, it goes fast because it was not factored correctly and the system that's in place to do so is not allowed to work as intended.
With the respect due fellow racers, what's wrong with factoring cars prudently commensurate with true performance capability? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Massapequa Park,NY
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 1,906
Liked 974 Times in 310 Posts
|
![]()
Put in a 5 speed manual and all is well.................and fun!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 884
Likes: 209
Liked 312 Times in 175 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 143
Likes: 3
Liked 80 Times in 29 Posts
|
![]()
It's the "holding" and protection of the combination that causes this dilemma.
In fairness and for the respect of competition, what's wrong with accurate factors based on actual performance capability? Those that aren't willing to apply the effort and invest the time won't compete favorably in any case. Last edited by Paradigm Shift; 06-14-2017 at 07:27 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Derby City, USA
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 1,085
Liked 8,052 Times in 1,529 Posts
|
![]()
A little interesting tidbit is that 1983 Camaro coupe is still factored at 263 HP.....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,821
Likes: 2,912
Liked 5,133 Times in 1,957 Posts
|
![]()
I thought I might make a couple of points here.
This is not meant to knock anybody .(Okay, maybe NHRA) .I've known Kenny for a long time . He helped me build a S/S Chevy II station wagon, over 40 years ago. He certainly has paid his dues, both literally and figuratively. * Jeff Stout told you what's supposed to happen if you show up with an F.I. air inlet duct in front of a 4 bbl. carb engine. That alone is a good reason to have knowledgeable tech guys look at every car, every race. * I always thought you supposed to take everything off of the front end of a drag car , that wasn't needed, no matter how small or light. ;-)
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 884
Likes: 209
Liked 312 Times in 175 Posts
|
![]()
If Tech says you need the body pcs. to present your Camaro as a Z28, like hood, ground effects, spoiler, etc. and of course your min. weight is different than a plain Camaro then that air inlet should be on the car. You can't suck and blow at the same time. Hey that's 2/3's of a pun, pu
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 2,987
Likes: 2,620
Liked 2,741 Times in 967 Posts
|
![]()
In a perfect NHRA tech environment, there would be proper technical inspections performed by dedicated and knowledgeable personnel with the resources necessary to enforce the rule book, and back in Glendora and the Divisional offices there would be a knowledgeable staff to closely monitor performance, factoring and technical standards.
At one time all this existed, but it will never happen again, the NHRA won't fund it because it's no longer important to them. They've made a business decision. Just an observation, not a criticism. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Niagra Falls, New York
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|