HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-12-2022, 10:46 AM   #1
Larry Hill
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,658
Likes: 1,948
Liked 10,804 Times in 2,245 Posts
Default GREAT Deal On 572 COPO

The new 572 COPO is just going to be a Index killer.
The crate motor is advertised at 720 Hp. with a smaller cam and a carburetor.
The 376 COPO is rated at 425 HP per NHRA Engine Specifications. Classification guide HP 415
The 427 COPO is rated at 470 HP per NHRA Engine Specifications.
The 572 COPO is rated at 500 HP per NHRA Engine Specifications.

Since I have my shoes of I will be able to do some simple math.

427-376 = 51 cu. in.
470-425 = 45 HP 470-415= 55 HP

45 HP/51 cu. in. = .882 HP per cu. in. . 55 HP/51 cu. in. = 1.078 HP per cu.in.

572-427 = 145 cu. in.
500-470 = 30 HP

30 HP /145 cu. in. = .207 HP per cu. in.

To me that is one heck of a deal, but is that fair to the rest of us?

GM thinks the 572 makes 1.25 HP per cu.in. How could NHRA assign such a low number to such a powerful engine?
I'm glad that the new COPO is here, but so disappointed at the HP rating.

I'm always surprised how much information I learn when I do a little home work, ie the 572 COPO is only 35 lbs heaver than a 302, 376, or 427 COPO's and it is 70 lbs lighter than the 350 blower COPO. And we wonder how the shipping weights get askew.

So if anyone has hopes of being number qualifier at this years US Nationals, get a 572 COPO or cross your fingers and hope the parachute deploys every qualifying run, because at .874 HP per cu.in. it an't going to happen!

From a rulebook "......providing the opportunity for fair competition; and
ever-present concern for safety"
__________________
IHM Used Parts
https://ihmusedparts.com
888-821-1817

Last edited by Larry Hill; 03-12-2022 at 11:28 AM. Reason: I used the COPO add for NHRA HP should have used Classification Guide HP
Larry Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2022, 11:48 AM   #2
James Perrone
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y.
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 3,399
Liked 1,835 Times in 428 Posts
Default Re: GREAT Deal On 572 COPO

Larry no different than the Fords And Mopars that started the stock eliminator evolution
Of BOGUS HP ratings
As I recall a new Denali has a higher HP rating on the valve cover that NHRA HP rated it for racing
Go figure
__________________
james perrone 1290 STK
James Perrone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2022, 05:46 PM   #3
GUMP
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 2,174
Liked 2,354 Times in 554 Posts
Default Re: GREAT Deal On 572 COPO

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Hill View Post
The new 572 COPO is just going to be a Index killer.
The crate motor is advertised at 720 Hp. with a smaller cam and a carburetor.
The 376 COPO is rated at 425 HP per NHRA Engine Specifications. Classification guide HP 415
The 427 COPO is rated at 470 HP per NHRA Engine Specifications.
The 572 COPO is rated at 500 HP per NHRA Engine Specifications.

Since I have my shoes of I will be able to do some simple math.

427-376 = 51 cu. in.
470-425 = 45 HP 470-415= 55 HP

45 HP/51 cu. in. = .882 HP per cu. in. . 55 HP/51 cu. in. = 1.078 HP per cu.in.

572-427 = 145 cu. in.
500-470 = 30 HP

30 HP /145 cu. in. = .207 HP per cu. in.

To me that is one heck of a deal, but is that fair to the rest of us?

GM thinks the 572 makes 1.25 HP per cu.in. How could NHRA assign such a low number to such a powerful engine?
I'm glad that the new COPO is here, but so disappointed at the HP rating.

I'm always surprised how much information I learn when I do a little home work, ie the 572 COPO is only 35 lbs heaver than a 302, 376, or 427 COPO's and it is 70 lbs lighter than the 350 blower COPO. And we wonder how the shipping weights get askew.

So if anyone has hopes of being number qualifier at this years US Nationals, get a 572 COPO or cross your fingers and hope the parachute deploys every qualifying run, because at .874 HP per cu.in. it an't going to happen!

From a rulebook "......providing the opportunity for fair competition; and
ever-present concern for safety"
Larry,

You are WAY too smart to be posting something this dumb.....
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams
NHRA Stock/SS 2007
GUMP is online now   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 03-12-2022, 06:36 PM   #4
Mike Gray
Senior Member
 
Mike Gray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 623
Likes: 313
Liked 695 Times in 201 Posts
Default Re: GREAT Deal On 572 COPO

A little bench racing info -
Max. bore 4.64, Max stroke 4.39 = 593.9ci Solid roller .731 lift, 2.25/1.88 valves dome piston, max compression 13.83 rated at 500hp in aa/s 3920lb and ss/a 3190lb.
__________________
Mike 7570 A/SA

Last edited by Mike Gray; 03-12-2022 at 06:42 PM.
Mike Gray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2022, 08:43 PM   #5
jamie2370
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Perry, GA
Posts: 331
Likes: 11
Liked 239 Times in 90 Posts
Default Re: GREAT Deal On 572 COPO

I wondered how long it would take Darren to respond lol. I am not sure that combo is near as fast as Larry is making it sound. As I have seen one run at a mineshaft race and honestly not near as impressive as those calculations make it sound. Not saying it doesn't have some potential but.....
jamie2370 is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 03-12-2022, 09:16 PM   #6
Tom P
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 707
Likes: 30
Liked 239 Times in 94 Posts
Default Re: GREAT Deal On 572 COPO

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Gray View Post
A little bench racing info -
Max. bore 4.64, Max stroke 4.39 = 593.9ci Solid roller .731 lift, 2.25/1.88 valves dome piston, max compression 13.83 rated at 500hp in aa/s 3920lb and ss/a 3190lb.
And the 90mm throttle body would be over 1100 cfm
Tom P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2022, 09:43 PM   #7
countrypuppy4865
Senior Member
 
countrypuppy4865's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Donaldsonville, LA
Posts: 981
Likes: 17
Liked 228 Times in 70 Posts
Default Re: GREAT Deal On 572 COPO

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Gray View Post
A little bench racing info -
Max. bore 4.64, Max stroke 4.39 = 593.9ci Solid roller .731 lift, 2.25/1.88 valves dome piston, max compression 13.83 rated at 500hp in aa/s 3920lb and ss/a 3190lb.
Mike this is an FS car
__________________
Jimmy "Cooter" Hidalgo, Jr.
4865 E/SA '04 GTO
4865 SS/GA '99 Firebird
countrypuppy4865 is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 03-13-2022, 06:05 PM   #8
Tom P
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 707
Likes: 30
Liked 239 Times in 94 Posts
Default Re: GREAT Deal On 572 COPO

Is anyone running one yet?
Tom P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2022, 06:13 PM   #9
herbjr
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Greensboro NC
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 1
Liked 83 Times in 32 Posts
Smile Re: GREAT Deal On 572 COPO

Letters have caused HP to be low for years,
herbjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2022, 06:59 PM   #10
Robin Lawrence
Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Galesburg IL.
Posts: 177
Likes: 256
Liked 715 Times in 120 Posts
Default Re: GREAT Deal On 572 COPO

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom P View Post
Is anyone running one yet?
Steve Foley is driving the first delivered 572 COPO at the Baby Gators and Gators.

I had the pleasure of racing him in class on Thursday. I red lighted and then lifted to his full run.

He ran 9.32 on what I think is a 9.70 index. The correction was 1.01 IRRC correctly.

They worked to get it to run that number. It's going to take a little more to make it a killer combination.

Robin
__________________
STK 308
SS 3088
Robin Lawrence is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.