|
|
View Poll Results: Agree or Disagree? | |||
Agree |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
123 | 96.85% |
Disagree |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 3.15% |
Voters: 127. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 1,444
Liked 4,365 Times in 501 Posts
|
![]()
Anyone who passes full teardown at Indy, or anywhere, should be awarded the record if they've broken the sitting record. Agree or Disagree?
Addition: This is assuming the 1% backup run requirement was satisfied as well as fuel and weight checked on said runs. Last edited by Bobby Fazio; 10-19-2024 at 03:33 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 487
Liked 346 Times in 126 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,443
Likes: 613
Liked 1,916 Times in 574 Posts
|
![]()
I agree with that.
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 784
Likes: 933
Liked 1,463 Times in 307 Posts
|
![]()
Good Poll Bobby. All we're talking about is bringing things up to date. We weren't allowed to set records at National Events in the past because the tech people were busy with teardowns from qualifying, then winners and runner-ups, pumping Comp cars and others, and teardowns from protests.
hence, we were regulated to the points meets and National Opens where the tech group would have time to accommodate the record setters. Fast forward to todays reality, where there are little to no teardowns, and it makes perfect sense that if your motor is coming down and you've exceeded the existing record, it is only 2 minutes of paperwork for NHRA to establish the runs as a new National Record. No need for NHRA to have any lengthy meetings, no weighing of pros and cons, there are no cons, JUST DO IT!! J.R. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 2,959
Likes: 2,548
Liked 2,626 Times in 950 Posts
|
![]()
I agree.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 915
Likes: 1,129
Liked 680 Times in 203 Posts
|
![]()
Nice! I agree.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 881
Likes: 206
Liked 308 Times in 173 Posts
|
![]()
The only problem I see is that they don't always check fuel or weight after every run. Unlike when you claim you are trying a record run.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 467
Likes: 308
Liked 561 Times in 138 Posts
|
![]()
If they do tear down at Indy they have checked fuel and weight, that?s the first thing they check.
__________________
Tim Stickles |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,732
Likes: 1,596
Liked 459 Times in 90 Posts
|
![]()
Absolutely !!!!!!!
__________________
Bob Bender 144 O/SA 2010-2012 National Record Holder |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rainy Washington
Posts: 608
Likes: 12
Liked 222 Times in 72 Posts
|
![]()
Here is an idea, anybody that runs faster then the current national record gets torn down and if passed gets the record. This would put the fear back into passing a teardown and curb the cheating. If the record was at a minimum people would be scared and change to a class that does have a actual record which would make more heads up runs and get combos in line
__________________
James Boyce 6052 K/SA Stock National record holder 2015,2018,2 times in 2022,2023 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|