|
![]() |
#11 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Thibodaux, LA
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 304
Liked 1,007 Times in 215 Posts
|
![]()
Then there is no debate.
__________________
Brett Candies 4192 Stock/SS God Bless America |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#12 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,582
Likes: 1,866
Liked 10,581 Times in 2,186 Posts
|
![]()
Bracket racing until Heads-up
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 28
Likes: 18
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
This is not legal. It is altered body work. It also appears to have less than three inches of ground clearance which the the rule book clearly states
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#14 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,416
Likes: 596
Liked 1,877 Times in 561 Posts
|
![]()
The general rules specifically allow a beam breaker in any class. It even spells out the size, positioning and heights. The rule in Super stock does not have any mention of a beam breaker in that section of the rule book. So that is open to interpretation. We need a clarification from NHRA tech for stock and super stock.
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Thibodaux, LA
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 304
Liked 1,007 Times in 215 Posts
|
![]()
Maybe so Mr. Larry.
Let?s play this out, say your DragPak and ours goes head up with same engine combos. One of the cars has one of these contraptions hanging on the bottom of it, the other does not. Technically the car that has this so called gadget has an advantage, does it not? If yes, then my opinion, that it is an unequal advantage and should not be allowed in especially Stock Eliminator, period, for any reason. But, if no advantage, then no reason to have a rule.
__________________
Brett Candies 4192 Stock/SS God Bless America Last edited by Brett C; 04-29-2025 at 10:04 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,582
Likes: 1,866
Liked 10,581 Times in 2,186 Posts
|
![]()
It?s always fun to race y?all. As the rules are written I think the stripe taker is legal. If we race and y?all have one I have no complaints on the within the rules part. In my opinion the Candies teams play by the rules.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Derby City, USA
Posts: 3,562
Likes: 1,057
Liked 7,570 Times in 1,458 Posts
|
![]()
I guess my good friend Toby Lang was correct when he told me 25 years ago that we are ( ) Racing 99 percent of the time …..
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 130
Likes: 50
Liked 430 Times in 72 Posts
|
![]()
Coming Soon!
![]()
__________________
Brian Zenzen SS 5404 STK 5401 |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#19 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 498
Likes: 1,357
Liked 1,009 Times in 287 Posts
|
![]()
Worst part of this whole deal is I can't even make a useful one for my combo. To get a stripe catcher to work on my car would be almost impossible. The difference in the front of my car from ride height to full extension is so large, that I'd never be able to get one that always caught the beam whether I'm in the gas or not. To get it low enough to trip the 5 inch tall finish line beam, it would have to be on the ground all the rest of the time. I'll get in the shop and see what I can fab up just for the sake of a new project, but looks like I won't be running one legal or not.
__________________
Dawson Pauley #2827 N/SA 1980 Malibu SW 2S 305/180 #2827 S/ST 1978 Mazda RX7 w/ 383 sbc/glide |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#20 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Thibodaux, LA
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 304
Liked 1,007 Times in 215 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
It obviously seems that tech didn't throw it out so?. I guess the debate now is should racers fight to make it illegal in stock at least???
__________________
Brett Candies 4192 Stock/SS God Bless America |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|