worst red light debate, again!

[Jim Wahl]

Originally Posted by Jeff Lee

No Jim
No Bill

I have given a reason more than once. If I give a reason and you fail to recognize it as such, you either disagree with it and refuse to recognize it as valid or you refuse to recognize it because it just might make sense. NHRA told me it made sense and it took all of 3 seconds for the NHRA Glendora based official (that would be management level, rule maker type, not the janitor or receptionist type). Either way, it appears to me you want to bury any opposition with page after page of the same rhetoric and the same "repeat after me mantras." I do not have the time or desire to repeat it again. Hell I don't have the time to read the posts on this subject from the last 5 hours. My comments are posted here more than once, find it and study it because I'm not looking for it and I surely don't have the time to type out 300 paragraphs a day that say the same thing over and over again. So if you don't get it then stay focused on the mantra. "red light not fair, red light not fair..."

Not sure what you are talking about? I stated several times you HAD stated a reason why you were opposed to Bill's idea. Look back at my posts if you want. I just don't think that your reason " I built my car to take advantage of the red light situation and to change it would be unfair to me" (summarizing here) is a great reason not to change it. That's all. Jim

.Why are you up so late?

.