Stocker Cylinder Heads....

Bobby Zlatkin · 06-21-2012, 11:15 AM

Rich, I had a 210 four door hardtop 220 HP that ran H/S. 3316 lb. shipping weight. Came in at 15.06 in a 15 lb. class. The 2 dr. sedans & hardtops had to run G/S. That's when we couldn't add or subtract weight and sometimes had to run an ugly body style to make the class.

I also used the Carter WCFB although a lot of the guys were running the Rochester which
I think later proved to be the better carb or at least the carb of choice.

I think the later 327 solid lifter cam was the .030-.030 cam. The 283 solid lifter cam called for .008"-.018". Still noisy but sounded good when pulling through the local drive-in.

I had to run the hydraulic lifter cam, as you did.

When I first started running that car in 1962 it was classified in F/S but as more classes were added at the top, it got pushed down to F/S. Now, I believe the 15 lb. class is N/S.

06-21-2012, 11:15 AM	#11
Bobby Zlatkin Member Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Mills River, NC Posts: 417 Likes: 0 Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: Stocker Cylinder Heads.... Rich, I had a 210 four door hardtop 220 HP that ran H/S. 3316 lb. shipping weight. Came in at 15.06 in a 15 lb. class. The 2 dr. sedans & hardtops had to run G/S. That's when we couldn't add or subtract weight and sometimes had to run an ugly body style to make the class. I also used the Carter WCFB although a lot of the guys were running the Rochester which I think later proved to be the better carb or at least the carb of choice. I think the later 327 solid lifter cam was the .030-.030 cam. The 283 solid lifter cam called for .008"-.018". Still noisy but sounded good when pulling through the local drive-in. I had to run the hydraulic lifter cam, as you did. When I first started running that car in 1962 it was classified in F/S but as more classes were added at the top, it got pushed down to F/S. Now, I believe the 15 lb. class is N/S. __________________ Bobby & Norene Zlatkin L/SA