What's wrong with Stock?

Jeff Stout · 09-04-2014, 01:29 PM

Now that the older cars ran their heart out and received a gift for the effort it now makes the old cars further away (under index) from qualifying. Some were .5-7 behind new cars and now .8 to 1.00 behind. Not a good feeling Im sure. Any new vehicle falls into x category until a time period (3-5 years) and then can run each other and then be classified into proper class at that time especially when the wrong HP is always going to be given from the start. Something like when the FI cars were sent into their own class and then brought back.This would go for ANY new vehicle introduced into the classification guide. That way things can get into line better without so much ill will from the older type cars. New cars are great and I like them, but play fair.

09-04-2014, 01:29 PM	#11
Jeff Stout VIP Member Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: phoenix Posts: 1,486 Likes: 66 Liked 704 Times in 281 Posts	Re: What's wrong with Stock? Now that the older cars ran their heart out and received a gift for the effort it now makes the old cars further away (under index) from qualifying. Some were .5-7 behind new cars and now .8 to 1.00 behind. Not a good feeling Im sure. Any new vehicle falls into x category until a time period (3-5 years) and then can run each other and then be classified into proper class at that time especially when the wrong HP is always going to be given from the start. Something like when the FI cars were sent into their own class and then brought back.This would go for ANY new vehicle introduced into the classification guide. That way things can get into line better without so much ill will from the older type cars. New cars are great and I like them, but play fair. Last edited by Jeff Stout; 09-04-2014 at 01:37 PM. Reason: more