Stock suggestion #3

442OLDS · 09-11-2014, 07:27 PM

I think all of these "suggestions" were primarily about INDY.There was a Factory Stock Class that did not have to worry about getting horsepower.

I think the reason that they did this was to prevent a bunch of cars shutting off early like a lot of older cars do.Keep REAL racing.However,"most" old cars can't shut off and run that fast in nearly 4000 ft air.

I can't believe the original authors of the AHFS did not take into account the weather conditions at all.They treat Bristol and Houston as one and the same.Not a good idea.

Maybe they need to shut off the clocks at Indy next year,and after qualifying,they can post who the quickest cars are.After that,they can administer AHFS for ALL qualifiers.

09-11-2014, 07:27 PM	#11
442OLDS VIP Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Elgin,IL Posts: 1,339 Likes: 5 Liked 282 Times in 103 Posts	Re: Stock suggestion #3 I think all of these "suggestions" were primarily about INDY.There was a Factory Stock Class that did not have to worry about getting horsepower. I think the reason that they did this was to prevent a bunch of cars shutting off early like a lot of older cars do.Keep REAL racing.However,"most" old cars can't shut off and run that fast in nearly 4000 ft air. I can't believe the original authors of the AHFS did not take into account the weather conditions at all.They treat Bristol and Houston as one and the same.Not a good idea. Maybe they need to shut off the clocks at Indy next year,and after qualifying,they can post who the quickest cars are.After that,they can administer AHFS for ALL qualifiers.