|
![]() |
#17 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 40
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
R. Pinoski,
Yes, you are reading it wrong. Your example of the 1/31/2003 AHFS is not at all correct. What you posted on this wedsite is not what appears on the NHRA website. For some reason, you missed an entire paragraph which fits in above the "class average" paragraph and reads as follows: ENGINE FAMILY AVERAGE FOR THE SPECIFIC ENGINE COMBINATION BEING REVIEWED. ALL CARS, REGARDLESS OF CLASS, RUNNING THE PARTICULAR ENGINE COMBINATION BEING REVIEWED ARE INCLUDED IN THIS SCREENING. Bruce, enough is enough. The basic format of the AHFS has not changed since its inception. You are more than welcome to your opinion and I will respect that. I am very sorry that you continue to feel ill-treated because of a horsepower adjustment you received, as a result of your not paying attention to the issue. As I stated previously on this thread, next week at the PRI show, key NHRA tech personnel will have a meeting to finalize a revised AHFS for racers to see. The new AHFS will most likely have changes to it, therefore, continuing this conversation is a moot point. The tech department will post the revised AHFS after the PRI meeting, on the NHRA website, for all racers to review. Hope to see some of you at the PRI show. Thank you for your past support and emails, and, thank you for racing NHRA.
__________________
Len Imbrogno Last edited by Len Imbrogno; 12-01-2007 at 11:15 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|