|
![]() |
#13 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 132
Liked 373 Times in 131 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Since I am a Ford guy, I did some studying of the classification guide for the OBD II Fords model years dating back to 1996. (FS cars do not count) I find it interesting that in the last 10 years not one single 96 and newer eligible Ford has neither had a horsepower increase due to going too quick, nor has there been a h.p. decrease due to someone barely running the index and requesting a decrease in h.p. That right there is telling to me...it means the combos are over factored and no one wants to build them. If they did build them, they need to be at least 7-8 tenths under to be somewhat competitive .... (competitive meaning standing a decent chance in a same class match up ) Hasn't happened in 20 years because none of the production line OBD II Ford models are factored correctly. IMO, NHRA needs to factor the production line models at 80% of their advertised SAE h.p. and let the racers build the combos. Then let the AHFS take care of the quick combos. Until then, I suppose we are back to 25-50 year old cars for the most part as our only choice.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|