What Stock rules would you change?

[Billy Nees]

Originally Posted by Jack McCarthy

Billy billy billy ... wth ? You got a pile of poorly factored cars you wanna make playa’s ?? 20% really 20% ... let’s see that’s about what the ffford got off seen any of them in the top 10 qualifier since then ??? Jim hale gets 43off a 383 /315 down to 272 and is #1 and admits it makes well over 500 on dyno ... and that’s only 15% > how about you pick a combo at whatever it is rated and race it if it’s a slug you picked like **** >>> it’s not Bernie sanders socialist stock everyone isn’t guaranteed to run a second under ������

Maybe 5 hp off after two years of racing and $5000 receipts during that time ����

Captain ��

Jack, have you been watching Adam Shiff for too long on TV? Hale's combo went from 325 to 265 in one shot. Just for the record, that's 18.46 %. I was thinking more along the lines of 389/421 or 348/409.
Maybe instead of un- competitive combos I should have said antiquated combos?
Yeah, I've got a bunch of bad combos laying around here but I'm not complaining and I'm not looking for new intakes, cams and cylinder heads either.
As far as "Bernie Sanders Socialist Stock", it kinda looks like that right now!
The ruling hierarchy (read; big-block anything) has gotten so many new "replacement" parts that you can build a new 396,426,427,428, 440 without using ANY STOCK parts! What did all of the peons get? Other than the 302 FFFFords (an action taken by a person in power who knew nothing about what he was doing) we haven't gotten much. We ARE however expected to pick up the same amounts of performance in relation to the index as the hierarchy.
And OBTW, why should I have to show anybody 5K in receipts and wait 2 years to get 5 HP back? The way that it's been done lately is to give certain people 5K cash or buy them lunch and you get what you want.