|
|
View Poll Results: INDY AHFS poll | |||
No AHFS (I have raced there in last 10 years) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
118 | 46.46% |
Yes AHFS (I have raced there in the last 10 years) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
33 | 12.99% |
No AHFS (I have NOT raced there in last 10 years) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
77 | 30.31% |
Yes AHFS (I have NOT raced there in last 10 years) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
26 | 10.24% |
Voters: 254. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 852
Likes: 991
Liked 2,343 Times in 465 Posts
|
![]()
Another no name that wants to tell me how to run my car. Send me a check and I'll run it what ever way you want me to. Better yet you build one spend a bunch of money and hours working on it so an antiquated AHFS can render it a slower car when your already not the fastest in the class. How about they fix the system and bring it up to date.
Epping had some great air and there were several cars that could have gone faster than 1.20. A lot of 1000 foot racing again. Epping was about 2 tenth faster than Indy and no one went 1.20 under. Why does anyone think guys will go 1.20 under at Indy unless their combo is so soft the hit will not matter. BP |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
|
|