HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-02-2024, 07:27 AM   #14
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,486
Likes: 3,587
Liked 7,683 Times in 1,731 Posts
Default Re: Is the 307 combination as Terrible as what Ive read ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by greatinspirational View Post
Thanks gentlemen

Im actually talking about the

1973 - 307 Nova

They have it at 195 HP

That has it falling in P/SA which has a 13.45 index and this ex Jim McDonald Nova hasnt even made a 13 second pass even with good parts in it. When he ran it it was a T/SA. I asked NHRA if the 195 is a misprint because its ludicrous to have this car factored to 195

Apparently it happened on 9/27/01

Does anyone know who it was that got the combo hit that hard ?
I believe that I've had my hands on this car at some point in time. The 73 307 is the absolute worst of all the 307s. It's the only one that has to use a 350 (993) head with big valves and big intake runners. Everything that a small carb, low RPM combo definitely doesn't need.
Best option? IMHO, run the 350 2V combo at 224 HP. It's not as good as the 69/70 2V deal but it uses the same head (993) and the 1.250v carb. I remember this car being a hatch? It would fit M/N/O.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K

Last edited by Billy Nees; 06-02-2024 at 10:04 AM.
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.