HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-15-2008, 03:29 PM   #14
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Thumbs down Re: Cylinder Head Runner Volumes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Butler View Post
"enough differences to keep them different" The problem now is they are so alike in major ways that where they are different is wasted money in a sense. No four links, no cam or manifold but both can be non stock and massaged.I am sure the research to set up manifold, suspension and cam specs would be very close to SS parts to start with. For the entry level idea a truely new Stock class with SET rules or spec parts could be started with limited classes for competition like the new cars and EVERYONE could restart at a much cheaper level if they wanted. S and SS could be one class for a small investment by current stockers compared to the overall cost of keeping up with the rules of StK.
Running Stock "parts" and rules should be a significantly less cost than stepping up to SS. If making it "stock" with massaged parts is about the same money then it is not a meaningful difference in classes.
Keep it more simple in the future..
my .02
That sounds like 1972 all over again and look what has happened !
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.