HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-15-2009, 11:03 AM   #1
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,489
Likes: 3,593
Liked 7,701 Times in 1,734 Posts
Default Re: Factory experimental

Bruce, welcome to my world.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline  
Old 01-15-2009, 11:39 AM   #2
Chad Rhodes
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Factory experimental

Bruce, I think you may be on to something. I know that the AHFS will not correct the factors on these cars in any reasonable amount of time. Considering that they aren't showroom available, they should not be allowed in the class. These cars don't have VIN numbers. while i think the involvement of detroit in S/SS is wonderful, as someone with alot of money and time invested in A/SA or AA/SA it sickens me to think of how much it would cost to compete with these guys
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA
Chad Rhodes is offline  
Old 01-15-2009, 11:51 AM   #3
Jim Kaekel
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 133
Liked 530 Times in 108 Posts
Default Re: Factory experimental

It's obvious that NHRA made a "deal with the devil" when they changed the wording in the rule book a couple of years back, adding the "special production run" clause of 50 cars for manufacturers. I see there are four '08 Mustangs (Calvert, J. Waldo, Stinnett, Ronzello) entered for Pomona. No new Challengers yet, but they are sure to come in the near future. It will be interesting how all of this sorts out. The positive I see is that this may generate some much needed publicity for our class.
__________________
Jim Kaekel 3836 STK
Jim Kaekel is offline  
Old 01-15-2009, 12:23 PM   #4
Woodro Josey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
Default Re: Factory experimental

I have about decided, we are on the losing end of a sinking ship. That means if they are rating these cars at 700hp, how much will a race prepaired, really make, and this is in Stock. Try gettin one of those babys insured for the street, they are street legal cars, right?
__________________
Woodro Josey 2002 STK

Last edited by Woodro Josey; 01-15-2009 at 04:51 PM.
Woodro Josey is offline  
Old 01-15-2009, 12:42 PM   #5
bill dedman
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: Factory experimental

How are these cars any different from a 1968 Dart/Barracuda Hemi car, or a Thunderbolt? Both are non-street-legal factory cars, both have outrageously powerful engines that wouldn't be happy in a grocery getter, and both are EXTREMELY limited production cars.

What did they do with the Hemis and T-Bolts?

They put them in their appropriate Super Stock classes, where they could "play with their own kind."

There IS no Factory Experimental class in the rule book, and hasn't heen for eons, but there sure as hell are Super Stock classes for these cars, and I think that's where they belong. Let's see how they fare against Brandon Wilkinson's car, heads-up, or any of the Hemi '65 Plymouths and Dodges in SS/B...

Apples to apples...

That IS what they did with the '68 competition Hemis and Thunderbolts...

What's good for the goose, etc., etc., etc....

What think ye? They sure as hell don't belong in Stock Eliminator, for a variety of reasons!
__________________
Bill
bill dedman is offline  
Old 01-15-2009, 01:51 PM   #6
Greg Hill
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 68
Liked 279 Times in 68 Posts
Thumbs down Re: Factory experimental

All this does is re-enforce my feeling that the powers that be either don't have a clue or really don't care about stock eliminator. These factory built race cars belong in some class besides stock eliminator. A " 68 " Z-28 can't even run the 2x4's or the cam that anyone could order from the factory and have delivered to the dealer in the trunk of the car. Now whatever the factory wants to do is okay even though these are not even street legal cars. A lot of A and AA cars are going to be obsolete.

Greg
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK
Greg Hill is offline  
Old 01-15-2009, 01:52 PM   #7
danny waters sr
VIP Member
 
danny waters sr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: lagrange,nc
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Unhappy Re: Factory experimental

New classes AF/S & AF/SA = All new Fords AD/S & AD/SA = All new Dodge & Chyrsler (or even AM/S or AM/SA for Mopars) AG/S & AG/SA = All General Motors. All with their own indexes and Factors.This reminds me of mixing fuel injections with carb classes . In my opinion this is the way it should be if they want to run stock..Who knows ,maybe this is the new answer to cutting out real stockers at NHRA. These cars could easily take your place in the big show. That would make them happy . Just thinking out loud ..
__________________
Danny Waters, Sr / 73 Duster "340"
danny waters sr is offline  
Old 01-15-2009, 02:17 PM   #8
Jeff Lee
VIP Member
 
Jeff Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Factory experimental

I made several posts on the new Cobra Jet Mustang in testing on this forum and the moderator deleted every one of them. Why, I have no idea. But I'll try again. 138 MPH with 210 degree water temps and pump-gas tune. ET was down in the low-mid 10's due to poor driving skills.
And NHRA has made statements in the past they do not support limiting or regulating boost on turbo applications but believe it is not acceptable to change boost on Supercharged applications by altering pulley diameters. That makes about as much sense as I don't know what! The way around this with SC applications is I'm sure the OEM will have different pulleys as OEM acceptable. They already offer a 5.4 SC Shelby factory delivered with 500 HP, 540HP, 625HP & 700 HP.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX
Jeff Lee is offline  
Old 01-22-2009, 05:12 PM   #9
CrateCamaro
Member
 
CrateCamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 411
Likes: 1
Liked 19 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: Factory experimental

I thought the big 3 (GM, Ford, Mopar) had no money??
__________________
Tony Valerio 1968 Camaro
1700 IHRA H/CM
1701 NHRA SS/?A
CrateCamaro is offline  
Old 01-15-2009, 02:18 PM   #10
Rory McNeil
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 316
Liked 1,103 Times in 301 Posts
Default Re: Factory experimental

Well... according to my NHRA Rulebook, the 3rd paragraph states "OEM may apply for inclusion of any special production runs into the Official NHRA Stock Car Classification Guide. Special run must include a minimum of 50 units of an already accepted body style, need NOT be showroom available. Applications evaluated on an individual basis. Acceptance will not imply precedent".
A quick peek at my 2004 Rulebook has the exact paragraph, word for word. Wouldn`t this same situation be how the 66 427 Fairlanes, COPO and Yenko Camaros, "Firehawk" late model Firebirds, the LT1 powered 97-98 Camaro & Firebirds, and possibly some other vehicles that Joe Blow off the street would never have been able to purchase from his local dealership?
As for the percieved domination of these Mustangs, it kinda sounds like many racers complaints when the EFI cars started getting popular. "The aerodynamics, high tech vodoo, better wight balance, etc" was going to ruin it for the "little guy". When the EFI classes were blended with the traditional Stockers, the "fuelies" were gonna eat the older cars for lunch. At the end of the 2008 season, there were more carbed cars in the top 10, and the vast majority of NHRA National records were held by the older cars too. I think a sit & wait approach would be better than panicking. Granted ,it did take NHRA a while to get the LS1`s HP rating within reason, but then Pontiac WAS the "Offical Car of NHRA" at the time, Ford isn`t, so maybe NHRA would be a bit quicker to react if the new Cobra Jet does indeed run away from the pack. As for superchargers in Stock, they were legal in the 57 Fords, and several versions of Studebakers years ago, and Turbos have been allowed for years, so whats the differance? Personally, I think that any forced induction Stocker should be limited to the factory boost pressure, but maybe thats just me. I guess Pomona will tell the story, right?
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK
M/S 85 Mustang
Rory McNeil is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.