HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-26-2009, 01:15 PM   #1
Tim Kish
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 281
Likes: 2
Liked 11 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: Mustang MPH?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lee View Post
I still can't believe the debate is as much about the HP factor than the fact Ford does not build a Mustang with a supercharged 5.4L engine in it. Shelby does and that is a different manufacturer and what Shelby offers is a much heavier car. This Mustang is a factory built race car not sold for public highways and is therefore a factory produced super stocker by every tradition and past example in NHRA history.
But then again I see the "Thunderbolt" 427 / 425 Fairlane is legal for Stock Eliminator. When did that happen? That's another "off highway use" vehicle. But the Hemi Dart / Barracuda & 1969 AMX SS package are still Superstock only classifications.
I'd just like to see some uniformity...

Jeff - we've been over this before, I even posted production numbers. 5.4L supercharged Mustangs are built by Ford on the same assembly line as every other Mustang they produce. As uninformed as your average Ford dealer is they even know what motor comes in a GT500 (5.4L Supercharged) and where its built (Ford Vehicle Assembly- Dearborn Michigan), says so right on the window sticker.
__________________
Tim Kish
3032 SS/GS
Tim Kish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 01:18 PM   #2
Bob Pagano
VIP Member
 
Bob Pagano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New Holland, PA Mooresville,NC
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 248
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Default Re: Mustang MPH?

There are no new Cobra Jet car's listed in stock for Gainsville
__________________
Bob Pagano A/SA
Bob Pagano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 01:40 PM   #3
Bruce Noland
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
Default Re: Mustang MPH?

Tim,

I don't know jack about Mopar products. But I do understand how much you would like to deflect attention away from the actual numbers for the CJ which you refuse to offer.

The CJ waltzing into Stock is the true absurdity. Not whether we think it should take you 20 years to make the CJ fast. We all know how you did that. How about a Horsepower figure on that motor (not the limit)? The FRP folks say 750 with no problem. Do you agree with them?
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK
Bruce Noland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 01:51 PM   #4
Tim Kish
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 281
Likes: 2
Liked 11 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: Mustang MPH?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Noland View Post
Tim,

I don't know jack about Mopar products. But I do understand how much you would like to deflect attention away from the actual numbers for the CJ which you refuse to offer.

The CJ waltzing into Stock is the true absurdity. Not whether we think it should take you 20 years to make the CJ fast. We all know how you did that. How about a Horsepower figure on that motor (not the limit)? The FRP folks say 750 with no problem. Do you agree with them?
Not deflecting - looking for equal time. Just as unfair that those cars aren't competitive due to incorrect factoring.

The monster HP numbers you are assuming this motor can make will require a pulley change and a bigger throttle body (neither are stock eliminator legal).


Thanks Blue Oval Ralph for the correction - fact remains they are regular Ford production vehicles.
__________________
Tim Kish
3032 SS/GS
Tim Kish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 01:59 PM   #5
Bruce Noland
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
Default Re: Mustang MPH?

Tim,

That's really nice that you are concerned about the Mopar guys.

I'm not assuming anything. I'm posting what the Ford guys told me. I guess we'll have to wait a few more weeks.

Thanks
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK
Bruce Noland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 11:25 PM   #6
Frank Bialas
Member
 
Frank Bialas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 253
Likes: 6
Liked 24 Times in 14 Posts
Default Re: Mustang MPH?

[QUOTE=Bruce Noland;107808]

That's really nice that you are concerned about the Mopar guys.

BTW - no response from you regarding the Hemi's? Don't wanna bring that up as it doesn't benefit your cause?

Glad someone remembers the bashing received by the HEMI and what about the 440-6pak now rated at 417HP. What I want to say is it's sad when a combination is rated so high that it no longer can compete and slowly disappears, lots of really neat cars get parked when this happens. It may take a long time to reel in this new combo, unless someone let's it happen! And the present system can only work as well as the information [#'s] it's fed. I feel the pain and won't be going into A/SA till some adjustments are made.
__________________
Frank Bialas 1570 STK
Frank Bialas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 04:37 PM   #7
GUMP
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 2,197
Liked 2,364 Times in 560 Posts
Default Re: Mustang MPH?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Noland View Post
How about a Horsepower figure on that motor (not the limit)? The FRP folks say 750 with no problem. Do you agree with them?
Bruce,

If you read back over several of the Ford guys posts I think that you will see that they believe that a loophole exists in regards to pulley size. From what I understand, that loophole does not exist, so the stock pullies put a true limit to the HP potential of these motors. Keep in mind too, that a F/I motor will not respond as well to a lot of the normal stocker enhancements as a N/A motor will.

Why not give this a little time?

Daren
GUMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 05:43 PM   #8
bigshow2966
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: chicago
Posts: 656
Likes: 690
Liked 181 Times in 56 Posts
Talking Re: Mustang MPH?

Here's a legitimate suggestion for you guys that think the Mustang is factored soft.

Sit down and get your FACTS together as to why you believe the way you do. Submit them in a letter to Glendora. If you have solid evidence and don't merely write some emotional piece of tripe as to why you are getting screwed, maybe, just maybe, they'll add some HP to the Fords.

I have seen it work before. Just remember to stick with FACTS.
bigshow2966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 06:20 PM   #9
Bruce Noland
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
Default Re: Mustang MPH?

Big Show,

Actually that is nhra's job, but they have no facts about this car. Mostly because the FRP folks don't want nhra to know about the real numbers on the CJ motor. A 9.78 on their second effort might set off a few alarms.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK
Bruce Noland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 06:26 PM   #10
Bruce Noland
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
Default Re: Mustang MPH?

Gump,

I'm guilty of reading and responding to the last post before I saw you post.

Sure, they have all the time in the world now. They nearly slipped one by us but we caught it in time and all we can do now is wait for the numbers to come rolling in.

I understand one of these motors may make it to a dyno soon. So they have all the time in the world or until nhra folds which ever comes first.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK
Bruce Noland is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.