|
|
|
|
05-04-2009, 09:47 PM
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 541
Likes: 11
Liked 20 Times in 14 Posts
|
Re: Fred Henson vs. Sorenson
Why??????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????
Water condition? who cares! if he done something illegal then he should be suspended!! if he crossed scale and did not make weight the run does not count!! |
|
|
|
05-04-2009, 09:59 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
|
Re: Fred Henson vs. Sorenson
Quote:
All that's required is a simple yes or no.Not a lawyer answer. Why didn't the final qualifying sheet show the DQ for the final run?Answer anyone? Ed
__________________
Former NHRA #1945 Former IHRA #1945 T/SA Last edited by Ed Fernandez; 05-04-2009 at 10:03 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
05-04-2009, 09:59 PM
|
#3 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
Re: Fred Henson vs. Sorenson
Junior said: "if he done (sic) something illegal then he should be suspended!! If he crossed scale and did not make weight the run does not count!!"
That's pretty simple logic...
__________________
Bill |
|
|
|
|
05-04-2009, 10:25 PM
|
#4 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 68
Likes: 9
Liked 9 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: Fred Henson vs. Sorenson
Biill,
AHFS rules don't say anything about weight. They say you go 1.40 under the sea level index you get 3.25% HP period. If you are dumb enough to run your car light and go 1.40 under then you probably deserve a bigger hit than that. Hensen didn't weigh, no fuel check, and no tear down to verify legal motor. He got 15 HP the following Monday. Sorenson should get the same and a vacation for altering weight after the run before the scales. They are not novice racers and know better than to do what they did. Dave Schmitz |
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
