HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-25-2009, 10:03 PM   #1
Chad Rhodes
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

Quote:
Originally Posted by bill dedman View Post
Junior Barnes said, "One went across the scale and one did not! The one that did not give up his rights to a fair trial (so to speak)"

A "fair trial" would be to prove his innocence.... on the contention that he was of legal weight.

When you give that up, the assumption becomes that you were "guilty".... LIGHT.

Your spin on this defies simple logic, Junior....

They're both "guil;ty (assumed light in Fred's case; PROVEN light in Sorensen's.)

Same result should be imposed on both. No way to prove that Fred's car was of the correct weight.
Henson's run was on a redlight 1st round at the D4 points race in Belle Rose. He was not required to go to the scales, he did not "AVOID" the scales. I was helping a friend that weekend and we were parked next to fred, I assure the car wasn't light and he didnt mean to do it
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA
Chad Rhodes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 02:41 AM   #2
bill dedman
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

Chad,

If Fred didn't go to the scales after the run, he avoided them, whether intentionally, or not. He had no reason to go to them, having just lost that round.

This is not in any way shape, or form critical of what Fred did; it's just an effort to get the two situations (Sorensen and Henson) "on the same page" so some logical conclusions can be drawn.

Your contention that he wasn't light is probably correct, but because it's just YOUR OPINION, it's not the sort of thing that NHRA could hang a far-reaching decision on.

The fact is, nobody (but Fred) knows what his car weighed when he made that run.

Nobody will EVER know, for sure. Ballast (some of it) is easily removeable.

In that vein, the car POSSIBLY could have been light, in spite of your considered opinion. I'm certainly not saying it was, because there's no way for me to know FOR SURE.

If it was, (in this case, a distinct possibility), then how can they give him HP? Even if it were NOT, how can they give him HP since they don't REALLY know what the car weighed on that run? They can't just ASSUME it was of legal weight... nobody's crystal ball is accurate under those circumstances.

The circumstances and similarities between what happened at Boise and in Fred's case would seem to me to be very similar in view of the fact that one car was weighed and was light; the other car was NOT weighed so cannot be proven NOT to have been light at that time.

But then, that's just MY take on it... I'm sure NHRA is going to do whatever THEY want to do with this.
Nothing could matter less than what ~I~ think...
__________________
Bill

Last edited by bill dedman; 05-26-2009 at 02:44 AM.
bill dedman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 07:52 AM   #3
Super Sport
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes View Post
Henson's run was on a redlight 1st round at the D4 points race in Belle Rose. He was not required to go to the scales, he did not "AVOID" the scales. I was helping a friend that weekend and we were parked next to fred, I assure the car wasn't light and he didnt mean to do it

How can anyone possibly think that Henson was light? He was in eliminations. He intended to win that round. It was correct for him to get horsepower.

Sorensen was light because he adjusted his weight after the run before coming to the scales. He left the starting line with the intention of qualifying. He has had that car long enough to know exactly what it weighs on every run. He should get horsepower and an extended vacation.
Super Sport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2009, 07:30 PM   #4
Urraco
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

Problem is there is no tech as we used to know it.
Urraco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2009, 09:45 PM   #5
Crew Chief
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urraco View Post
Problem is there is no tech as we used to know it.

Not everywhere.....some places still believe in enforcing whats left of the rules.
Crew Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2009, 10:52 PM   #6
Urraco
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

Problem is that they dont enforce the rules equally. There are cars out there that are way off and no one is looking at them.
Urraco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2009, 08:47 AM   #7
Chad Rhodes
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urraco View Post
Problem is that they dont enforce the rules equally. There are cars out there that are way off and no one is looking at them.
that would be solved if they all showed up at the Cajun Sports Nationals, Wesley would catch em
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA
Chad Rhodes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2009, 12:27 PM   #8
s10stocker
Junior Member
 
s10stocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Thibodaux, LA
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes View Post
that would be solved if they all showed up at the Cajun Sports Nationals, Wesley would catch em
This would have never happened on Mr. Wesleys watch period. He may be very strict but very fair.
__________________
George Roussel Jr. 4262 1996 S10 n-o-p/sa
s10stocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.