|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
|
![]()
There will always be a difference of opinions on Indexes, triggers, AHFS, etc. One fact is the current Indexes are soft. Not opinion, fact. I looked up the Indexes from 1990, and compared to todays, some Indexes were as much as two tenths quicker in 1990. Since then a multitude of rule changes have come about, allowing parts and stuff that were not legal in 1990, cars have picked up several tenths since then, and the Indexes have become slower? Doesn't make much sense. All the Indexes of today could stand to lose some (although I would leave SS/AM as is, and maybe SS/AH). Two tenths or so would be a good start. Although, there starts the argument. If you lower the Indexes, say, two tenths across the board (five tenths is to much, IMO) and leave the triggers (-1.15 twice for a look and -1.40 for automatic), then that plays into the fast guys/girls hands...allowing them to run flat out with no, or reduced, penalties. If you lower the Indexes two tenths, and reduce the triggers to -.95 and -1.20, then you still have the same problem that some currently do not like, which is being unable to run flat out in Class Eliminations, or heads-up runs or setting records, without a potential penalty of HP adjustments. It would be hard to make an ideal scenario for the majority.
Here are the 1990 Indexes. SS/A 9.80 SS/B 10.00 SS/C 10.25 SS/D 10.35 SS/E 10.45 SS/F 10.55 SS/G 10.65 SS/H 10.70 SS/I 10.75 SS/J 11.00 SS/K 11.20 SS/L 11.40 SS/M 11.70 SS/N 12.05 SS/O 12.30 SS/P 12.60 SS/AA 9.85 SS/BA 9.95 SS/CA 10.15 SS/DA 10.30 SS/EA 10.45 SS/FA 10.55 SS/GA 10.65 SS/HA 10.75 SS/IA 10.85 SS/JA 11.10 SS/KA 11.35 SS/LA 11.65 SS/MA 11.95 SS/NA 12.25 SS/OA 12.50 SS/PA 12.75 GT/A 10.10 GT/B 10.20 GT/C 10.30 GT/D 10.45 GT/E 10.60 GT/F 10.70 GT/G 10.85 GT/H 10.95 GT/I 11.05 GT/J 11.15 GT/K 11.25 GT/L 11.40 GT/M 11.50 GT/AA 10.25 GT/BA 10.35 GT/CA 10.50 GT/DA 10.60 GT/EA 10.75 GT/FA 10.90 GT/GA 11.10 GT/HA 11.15 GT/IA 11.30 GT/JA 11.45 GT/KA 11.55 GT/LA 11.65 GT/MA 11.75 SS/AS 9.75 SS/BS 9.85 SS/CS 10.30 SS/AM 9.40 SS/BM 9.60 SS/CM 9.80 SS/DM 10.00 SS/EM 10.20 SS/FM 10.60 SS/GM 10.60 A/S 11.09 B/S 11.29 C/S 11.47 D/S 11.62 E/S 11.76 F/S 11.90 G/S 12.00 H/S 12.09 I/S 12.28 J/S 12.43 K/S 12.67 L/S 12.81 M/S 12.95 N/S 13.05 O/S 13.19 P/S 13.47 Q/S 13.76 R/S 14.05 T/S 14.48 U/S 14.77 V/S 15.39 W/S 15.96 A/SA 11.17 B/SA 11.37 C/SA 11.51 D/SA 11.66 E/SA 11.80 F/SA 11.95 G/SA 12.10 H/SA 12.24 I/SA 12.38 J/SA 12.53 K/SA 12.73 L/SA 12.82 M/SA 12.96 N/SA 13.11 O/SA 13.26 P/SA 13.54 Q/SA 13.89 R/SA 14.13 T/SA 14.67 U/SA 14.96 V/SA 15.71 W/SA 16.80
__________________
Mike Carr, Tri-State S/SS Association President Looking for 2015 S/SS Race Sponsors Contact me if interested buffdaddy_1302@hotmail.com (724) 510-5912 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 94
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Question of the year? Why are people worried about indexes. If there are any answers, I wlll take it from there. I will say the horse is dead and I think NHRA feels the same way.
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|