HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-09-2009, 08:46 AM   #1
Paul Merolla
Senior Member
 
Paul Merolla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Papillion, NE
Posts: 611
Likes: 244
Liked 293 Times in 65 Posts
Default Re: my opinion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evan Smith View Post
Since we all say that Stock and Super Stock are performance-based classes, let's bring performance into the points mix. My question is: should the national champions be simply the best bracket racers or the best overall racers, based on building and tuning your car as well?

Award points for the top 32 qualified spots at national and divisional events and award points for rounds won during class eliminations and for records set. This also will entice racers to run hard and the AHFS system will be more effective.
Evan, that's the FIRST rule change discussed on this thread that made any sense to me. Don and Jeff's ramblings sound like recess in 2nd grade..."I can't win so change the game to suit me!!" How many times do they have to explain it? The best 3 of the FIRST 6. Anyone who can attend 6 nationals has the same playing field as the guy that attends all 24.
Paul Merolla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2009, 11:03 AM   #2
west coast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rainy Washington
Posts: 610
Likes: 12
Liked 227 Times in 74 Posts
Default Re: my opinion

Evan those are some great points on how to help fix the AHFS great suggestion. Now if other people could be more postive about trying to fix it rather than complaining all the time. The only disadvantage to the current points system would be were you live and how many races are close to you. So that solution would to be move.
west coast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2009, 11:08 AM   #3
Harry 6674
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: my opinion

Evan that makes too much sense. A lot of people on this forum want to take performance out of these classes. I started racing when we ran off the records and not some arbitrary index number and I liked it. It is supposed to be about performance.
Harry 6674 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2009, 11:48 AM   #4
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,504
Likes: 3,606
Liked 7,814 Times in 1,748 Posts
Default Re: my opinion

Hey Ed, Bob deserves it!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2009, 11:50 AM   #5
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,504
Likes: 3,606
Liked 7,814 Times in 1,748 Posts
Default Re: my opinion

Hey Ed, it does amaze me how NHRA seems to have taken up a "Hands Off" policy towards certain racers.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2009, 01:47 PM   #6
Harry 6674
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: my opinion

I wouldn't have a problem with Bob Shaw winning the championship. Do you? If he is the fastest so be it. Wouldn't be fun not using window art to win? People would still be trying to protect their combos but it may cost them a few wins. The ahfs would start having an effect after all these years.
Harry 6674 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.