HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-19-2009, 10:22 AM   #1
Evan Smith
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa
Posts: 400
Likes: 7
Liked 115 Times in 5 Posts
Default Re: CJ engine options and HP ratings.

Sean, you are right, to the manufacturer it is about selling cars, which is why NHRA let GM racers run the LT-1 in the '98 F-bodies when these cars were never built. In my book this was the first "crate engine" stocker. Why was this not Super Stock only?



Evan
__________________
Evan Smith 1798 STK
Evan Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2009, 10:31 AM   #2
GUMP
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 2,180
Liked 2,359 Times in 557 Posts
Default Re: CJ engine options and HP ratings.

The truth is that this is what happens when the Big Three decide to get back into Stock/SS! The last time around they did everything they could with what they had in their parts bins to. Why should it be any different this time around? Why do you think they built Hemi cars, COPO cars, and Cobra Jet Mustangs in the late sixties? They sure weren't aimed at socker mums!
GUMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2009, 10:53 AM   #3
Chris "drooze" Wertman
VIP Member
 
Chris "drooze" Wertman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Barberton Ohio
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: CJ engine options and HP ratings.

Thak you so very very much at least there is one other guy on here who gets it

What I think is funny is there are guys running those cars and combos who are upset their 40 year old relics just got outdated by something that should have happened over 20 years ago. its the year 2009 for crying out loud...

Thanks GUMP, seriously thanks

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUMP View Post
The truth is that this is what happens when the Big Three decide to get back into Stock/SS! The last time around they did everything they could with what they had in their parts bins to. Why should it be any different this time around? Why do you think they built Hemi cars, COPO cars, and Cobra Jet Mustangs in the late sixties? They sure weren't aimed at socker mums!
Chris "drooze" Wertman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2009, 01:43 PM   #4
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,126
Likes: 1,583
Liked 1,892 Times in 423 Posts
Default Re: CJ engine options and HP ratings.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUMP View Post
The truth is that this is what happens when the Big Three decide to get back into Stock/SS! The last time around they did everything they could with what they had in their parts bins to. Why should it be any different this time around? Why do you think they built Hemi cars, COPO cars, and Cobra Jet Mustangs in the late sixties? They sure weren't aimed at socker mums!

There were over 1200 COPO L-72 Camaros built, 69 ZL-1 Camaros, plenty of L-88 Corvettes, around 500 or so L-72 69 Chevelles, and the list goes on. All real street legal cars sold at the dealership. Not only that, only the ZL-1 Camaro had a really high price tag.

If these cross breed crate motor combinations are legal, then why isn't a 67 Corvette L-88 legal? After all, they built and sold 36 of them. Who knows how many were given away.

If the Roush cars are legal, why aren't all the Yenko cars, or all of the Baldwin/Motion cars?

It's suddenly all fine and dandy to put just about anything in Stock Eliminator, regardless of whether or not it was even remotely intended for street use, or even produced at the factory. There used to be a rule about "export cars", "tuner cars" and all of that. Rules intended specifically to keep ringers with bogus factors out of Stock. But now it is evidently okay to put anything in Stock, regardless of it ever being actually produced or available in the showroom at all. And you can evidently name your own factor as well.

The idea that all of this is absolutely no different than 98 F bodies with 97 LT-1 engines is the biggest bunch of BS I've seen. In fact, evidently the 97 and 98 carry the same HP factor and the same curb weight. So, in effect, they're only different in appearance. But somehow they are as outrageously bogus as a car that has 650HP at the rear wheels in stock form being factored at 425 HP. Yeah, right.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2009, 02:16 PM   #5
69Cobra
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California, Ky
Posts: 669
Likes: 61
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: CJ engine options and HP ratings.

How about NHRA gets a moble chassis dyno and they pick and chose cars to put on the chassis dyno when a cars on its way back up the return road and start factoring all combos by there "real" hp. Everybody wants to bitch about everything let take the BS out of it and just show everybodys hand.
__________________
Kris Rachford
69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed
C/S 3032
69Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2009, 09:53 PM   #6
Dave Ficacci
Member
 
Dave Ficacci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Jersey
Posts: 372
Likes: 43
Liked 98 Times in 23 Posts
Default Re: CJ engine options and HP ratings.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69Cobra View Post
How about NHRA gets a moble chassis dyno and they pick and chose cars to put on the chassis dyno when a cars on its way back up the return road and start factoring all combos by there "real" hp. Everybody wants to bitch about everything let take the BS out of it and just show everybodys hand.


620 at the wheels.
I don't make that at the crank.
__________________
Dave Ficacci
1013 STK
1170 SS
Dave Ficacci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2009, 10:22 PM   #7
Jim Carter
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 190
Likes: 10
Liked 19 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: CJ engine options and HP ratings.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Ficacci View Post


620 at the wheels.
I don't make that at the crank.
David:
The silence is deafening...
Ouch!
Jim Carter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2009, 10:35 PM   #8
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,126
Likes: 1,583
Liked 1,892 Times in 423 Posts
Default Re: CJ engine options and HP ratings.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Ficacci View Post


620 at the wheels.
I don't make that at the crank.
Neither do we. And we're at only 4HP less than the recently refactored Cobra Jets that do.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2009, 11:00 PM   #9
69Cobra
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California, Ky
Posts: 669
Likes: 61
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: CJ engine options and HP ratings.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Ficacci View Post


620 at the wheels.
I don't make that at the crank.
That dyno is out of calibration.
__________________
Kris Rachford
69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed
C/S 3032
69Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2009, 11:19 PM   #10
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,126
Likes: 1,583
Liked 1,892 Times in 423 Posts
Default Re: CJ engine options and HP ratings.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69Cobra View Post
That dyno is out of calibration.
Which one? Are you sure? Because the dyno numbers sure match the performance so far.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.