|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Waldorf Md
Posts: 230
Likes: 12
Liked 30 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]()
Chad,
I just threw 2 complete sets of .001" lower half Big Block Rod bearings away on Friday for the same reason. I figure if Clevite tells you to run them that way, there must be a reason. The engineering side of me says that the thicker bearing will conform to the diameter of the crankshaft better and will result in a larger bearing area as compared to the thinner one.
__________________
Bill Koustenis |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lindstrom MN
Posts: 156
Likes: 7
Liked 54 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks guys, that is what my gut was telling me, so I ordered up a couple sets of bearings to mix and match the correct way.
Chad |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 172
Liked 727 Times in 221 Posts
|
![]()
Years ago, when I was a line guy at a Chevy dealer, the front main saddle on 350 blocks would move as the block seasoned on new cars and trucks. An attempt could be made to bring them somewhat into line by juggling over and undersize bearing inserts as long as the block stabilized. In extreme cases, the front main spun.This ruined the block, the crank and sometimes tossed the #1 rod as well. In an attempt to cut costs and be cheap, the thinwall castings weren't very stable, then were machined, then the casting moved and the critical dimensions went out of spec. That was a factory warranty fix to juggle bearing shells to move the hole back into place. Sort of an indictment on quality in the mid 70's.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|