HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-27-2010, 11:28 AM   #1
Bruce Noland
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
Default Re: Another bogus hp rating.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Kish View Post
You guys still don't get it. In 2010 when the factory advertises an engine makes say 300HP. It must dyno 300HP +/-3%.

Now look at the evolution of engine manufacturing and performance technology improvements over the last 40 years. Take a look at how 200ci V-6's are making as much horsepower as 400ci V8's were in the 60's. Do you really think that in Stock eliminator trim both engines have the same max power potential. If you do your morons. Current OEM technology is wringing HP out of engines the same way guys building stockers have done it for years. So an OEM engine which already comes with good valve springs, good flowing heads, roller cams, far better tuned intakes, larger TB's and a factory rating of 425HP (new car rating, not NHRAshould have an equivalent amount of inefficiency in the OEM design and power to be gained? Some of the performance vehicles offered today have tubular exhaust manifolds that rival the flow performance of a set of headers - not some junk cast iron log exhaust manifold that was designed for a utility truck 40yrs ago. Aside from the LS & LT engines from GM, prior to the CJ's and Drag Paks, what other engine combinations that have gone in the books the last 15 or so years have been able to compete when entered with the OEM advertised HP ratings? Most get submitted by someone that has no idea how NHRA's HP rating system works, the NHRA guys I doubt spend the effort to challenge an OEM submission if they think its overfactored.

I'm not defending the final numbers assigned to some of the combos as correctly factored. But if anyone thinks that they should go in with the 2010 OEM advertised HP ratings, i repeat - your a moron.
And this little rant comes from the er uh gentleman who claimed the CJ's could never make 800 hp with those little tiny throttles. Consider the source when reading this guy's stuff. He, of all people, is no positon to be calling people morons.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK

Last edited by Bruce Noland; 03-27-2010 at 02:28 PM.
Bruce Noland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2010, 12:45 PM   #2
Charley Downing
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 761
Likes: 16
Liked 633 Times in 88 Posts
Default Re: Another bogus hp rating.

Bruce the non Super CJ makes way less then 800hp to the rear wheels. What is you point.
__________________
Charley Downing 3548 STK
Charley Downing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2010, 12:57 PM   #3
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,118
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,836 Times in 417 Posts
Default Re: Another bogus hp rating.

It's interesting how people throw "torque" around.

HP=Torque x RPM / 5252

So HP is nothing other than a mathematical derivative of torque.

It's been a long time since I've seen a normally aspirated car in Stock Eliminator (especially when you get above L,M, or N) run less than about 5500 RPM stall, or leave at less than 5500 if it is a stick car.

So, 5500 RPM is above the point at which torque is a higher number than HP, as torque and HP will ALWAYS be equal at 5252 RPM, and torque will ALWAYS be greater than HP below 5252 RPM. That also means HP will ALWAYS be greater than torque above 5252 RPM.

In this modern era of efficient high stall converters that yield in excess of 2.0:1 torque multiplication at their flash stall speed, and trick clutches, when someone tells you that it is necessary to have "torque" when "moving a heavy Stock Eliminator car", remember that in order to make HP, you must have torque to begin with, since torque is the actual force, and HP is merely a mathematical derivative of the force called torque.

Two engines that have "X" HP at 6000 RPM have the same exact amount of torque at 6000 RPM, regardless of how many cubic inches they displace, what their bore/stroke ratio is, or what their rod/stroke ratio is.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2010, 02:16 PM   #4
Bruce Noland
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
Default Re: Another bogus hp rating.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charley Downing View Post
Bruce the non Super CJ makes way less then 800hp to the rear wheels. What is you point.
The point is you need to keep up with these threads if you want to brow beat folks. Read some of the old threads on the CJ's and you may learn something.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK
Bruce Noland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2010, 02:49 PM   #5
Tim Kish
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 281
Likes: 2
Liked 11 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: Another bogus hp rating.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Noland View Post
And this little rant comes from the er uh gentleman who claimed the CJ's could never make 800 hp with those little tiny throttles. Consider the source when reading this guy's stuff. He, of all people, is no positon to be calling people morons.
Bruce - you find me a dyno sheet from a Cobra Jet Stocker that makes over 800HP and I'll issue a formal apology to anyone wrongly accused of being a moron. Until then my statements stand.
__________________
Tim Kish
3032 SS/GS
Tim Kish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2010, 02:59 PM   #6
Bruce Noland
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
Default Re: Another bogus hp rating.

Yeah, I'll buy that one OK. Dyno sheets on the CJ motors can not be found; even with a search warrant. The Ford Racing Staff made that very clear to me. This is about as close as we non Ford guys can get on the Horsepower numbers for these cars. 145.57 MPH @ 3,465 pounds equals 820 horsepower.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK
Bruce Noland is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.