|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK Last edited by Bruce Noland; 03-27-2010 at 02:28 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 761
Likes: 16
Liked 633 Times in 88 Posts
|
![]()
Bruce the non Super CJ makes way less then 800hp to the rear wheels. What is you point.
__________________
Charley Downing 3548 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,118
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,836 Times in 417 Posts
|
![]()
It's interesting how people throw "torque" around.
HP=Torque x RPM / 5252 So HP is nothing other than a mathematical derivative of torque. It's been a long time since I've seen a normally aspirated car in Stock Eliminator (especially when you get above L,M, or N) run less than about 5500 RPM stall, or leave at less than 5500 if it is a stick car. So, 5500 RPM is above the point at which torque is a higher number than HP, as torque and HP will ALWAYS be equal at 5252 RPM, and torque will ALWAYS be greater than HP below 5252 RPM. That also means HP will ALWAYS be greater than torque above 5252 RPM. In this modern era of efficient high stall converters that yield in excess of 2.0:1 torque multiplication at their flash stall speed, and trick clutches, when someone tells you that it is necessary to have "torque" when "moving a heavy Stock Eliminator car", remember that in order to make HP, you must have torque to begin with, since torque is the actual force, and HP is merely a mathematical derivative of the force called torque. Two engines that have "X" HP at 6000 RPM have the same exact amount of torque at 6000 RPM, regardless of how many cubic inches they displace, what their bore/stroke ratio is, or what their rod/stroke ratio is.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]()
The point is you need to keep up with these threads if you want to brow beat folks. Read some of the old threads on the CJ's and you may learn something.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 281
Likes: 2
Liked 11 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Bruce - you find me a dyno sheet from a Cobra Jet Stocker that makes over 800HP and I'll issue a formal apology to anyone wrongly accused of being a moron. Until then my statements stand.
__________________
Tim Kish 3032 SS/GS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]()
Yeah, I'll buy that one OK. Dyno sheets on the CJ motors can not be found; even with a search warrant. The Ford Racing Staff made that very clear to me. This is about as close as we non Ford guys can get on the Horsepower numbers for these cars. 145.57 MPH @ 3,465 pounds equals 820 horsepower.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|