|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 541
Likes: 11
Liked 20 Times in 14 Posts
|
![]()
No critisizing here. If I had one I would race it. The problem I see is that if NHRA doesnt get a handle on the HP factors on all the combos that will be coming out from C thru M stock, the NHRA will see a big drop in the National participation!
Just my opinion |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 68
Liked 279 Times in 68 Posts
|
![]()
Darrell, since you chose to make this personal , i will say this. Is there any E/SA in division 3 that can't out run you. Let me see, Mitch Truman, Randy Simpson,Joey Wilkes, Jamie Fenner, Dan Walcott, and last but not least Jim Kakel, who runs the same combination as you and I have seen run in the 10's in E/SA. All you guys have to do is find a good engine builder, buy a good trans and converter, make sure your cars are as good as they can be and then start flogging to gain hundreths at a time. As far as my combination I don't think it's particularly favorable as there are at least 6 or 7 E/SA cars in the country that are faster than me.
Oh by the way I do happen to know a good engine builder in Dayton if you're interested. And for my signature I don't know how to change the number Kenny did that a couple of years ago.
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 2
Liked 325 Times in 50 Posts
|
![]()
I think there were a few more 5.7's. PB Candies (who has SS/BA Mustang # 13 also has Challenger # 13 and it is a 5.7. I will try to get the numbers. I just hope Greg don't send me a mail bomb. Don't take that wrong. Greg and I are good friends and there is nothing a couple of cases of beer won't cure.
__________________
Jeff Teuton 4022 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Elgin,IL
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 5
Liked 282 Times in 103 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
1) Didn't mean to make it personal 2) Its DARYL not DARRELL 3)Yes,we have the slowest cars in the country! 4)We have a good engine builder,thank you! 5)Yes,we have a good converter and transmission builder,thanks again! 6)Running in the 10's does NO good when some are 10.50! 7) We try our best to run as competitively as possible within budget and stay LEGAL! 8) WE DO spend money....I just spent $800 for some front wheels! 9) ANY heads up race and WE are DEAD! 10)What does this have to do with WHINING about bogus horsepower factors??? (I didn't start the thread) You should be HAPPY that YOU have cars in your division like ours that YOU can beat easily,even though there are SOME being built that can beat you easily! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Maybe using the money for #8 could have bought some HP for your car. If #s 4 and 5 are true why are you so slow? This has been a very amusing Sunday in the land of make believe.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945 Former IHRA #1945 T/SA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Does anybody realize that if there are no faster cars than you there is absolutly no incentive to work harder and go faster?
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Art. Incentive is not the issue here. there isn't anything any "old" stocker can do to run with one of theses new cars. nothing short of stopping it from getting to the starting line.
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
|
![]()
HP numbers are totally arbitrary.........A car is looking like it's real fast compared to others in it's class if it is factored way wrong.
LT-1's in 1996-1997 were doing the same thing. They were at something like 275 or 285 when new.....Now they are at 346....... I had a G-H/SA '69 Nova for a short stint back then.....not very fast but I was working on it slowly.....Saw one of those early LT-1's run in the 11.20's and 11.1's at one race at Maple Grove. It was in either G or H/SA at the time......Felt like the old cars were done...sold the Nova.....It took a while but the LT-1's continued to get HP and now they are about even or maybe a little down to some cars they run against today....and they run much higher on the class ladder.... The DP's and Mustangs appear to be at least as improperly HP rated as the LT-1's were........ If NHRA had a Tech Dept with any integrity....they'd step in and make some corrections to make it a more level playing field..... Their biggest problem is they have no classes to stick these cars in.....unless they are forced into Super stock and that is realy where they belong.... A Stocker that can run 145 mph is not a Stocker..... A new model Stocker that can run more than 1 second under on the brakes on the newly lowered indexes......has a bogus HP factor.....
__________________
Rich Biebel S/C 1479 Stock 147R Last edited by Rich Biebel; 03-28-2010 at 06:18 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|