|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
It was tried and the reason they dropped them was they didn't work. If they Worked they would still have them. You mention IHRA has them, they also have crate motor, and pure stock, Etc. And look at the car counts? We have enough classes already.
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,136
Likes: 1,612
Liked 1,922 Times in 432 Posts
|
![]()
The reason the FI classes were merged back in is because the HP rating disparity had been reduced to a survivable level. Sure, they wanted to reduce the number of classes, but it had become reasonable to do so as well.
They did work. The fact that the FI cars eventually fell in line close to the rest is a testament to that. I've been a fan of and an advocate for reducing the number of classes, at least in Stock, but the new cars have shown that there is a need for classes for "factory specials" or whatever you want to call the bogus combinations with absurd factors.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
So what about the car counts. That has nothing to do with how many classes the IHRA has or doesn't have. It has to do with it is the IHRA and the NHRA has always been a bigger draw. You have every right in the world to voice your opinion and I respect that. But it is no skin off your nose how the NHRA handles this one way or another. It is skin off my nose and it does affect me directly since I have to run these factory race cars heads up where you don't. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|