|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
I don't believe that the 55 and up rule will benefit anyone except the tri-five Chevy's. What other cars would be competitive, what other brands are being run in SS that might be able to compete as a stocker?
No Mopars, Pontiacs, Buicks, Olds, Fords or other brands are being run in SS, so who does it help? JimR
__________________
Jim Rountree |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: COLUMBUS,OHIO
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I'm wondering how an LS4 wwith a factory rating of 303 HP in an Impala would compare to the GMC turbo charger v6. Impala shows a 3711# shipping weight or 12.25 # per hp. Don't see how u ccould get to the 11.00# or around 3350#. Maybe Chevy has a secret superceded body to get the weight out. Does anyone know if the LS4 aluminum block motor in the 2006 up Impala is the same 5.3 that was in the SSR?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Frostproof, Fl.
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
I think the return of the 57 chevy to stock is great, think about how these cars helped mold the face of sportsman racing from Jr. stock on, look at the people that have raced one. like my hereo's Jimmy Waibel, Bob Dennis, Charlie Cason, Bruce Wilkerson and many many more. I am looking to see about rebuilding dads fugitive with the big W on the door. just to be able to run one has been a dream of mine not to mention the speeds they ran in the day with only 7" tires wow what can they run on 10" tires. my big question is how many will be built as a stick car like they were?
Jeremy Waibel K&N Filters 69 Camaro B/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Trussville, Alabama-Originally from Vidalia,GA
Posts: 642
Likes: 9
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Jeremy, did I not see your dads 57 chevy painted on the den wall at his house in Lakeland? FrankChastain
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: lagrange,nc
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Why not have baseball 5 strikes you out or have football closest to the goal after 4 downs each gets the TD, lol . Drag racing is fine ,don't need to re- invent the wheel ,just fix the flat and go.
__________________
Danny Waters, Sr / 73 Duster "340" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 1,451
Liked 4,365 Times in 501 Posts
|
![]()
I like the break-out rule the way it is. As far as the red light rule, here is my suggestion (just a suggestion people). How about extending the tree blocker all the way down to cover the red-light bulb and then the worst red-light loses? I believe the red bulb does cause a distraction to the faster car, especially in a 1-3 bulb handicapped race. The scoreboard would not light up until the second car leaves and the computer determines which light is "more red" so that wouldn't be a distraction either. The code for that loop would be simple to write, we were taught how to write a similar program during my freshman year at college. Rules would stay as they currently are on a bye run, automatic win, no red light or break out in a bye run. Again, this has nothing to do with "first guy to break out loses.." Comparing these two rules is apples and oranges.
Secondly, just from being the chaser in bracket racing to getting chased like a gang member in Super stock.. anyone who is even attempting to say that slower cars have an advantage in a drag race should really think through their hypothesis again (or must really have eyes in the back of their Simpsons). The whole race is in front of you, and currently you have the red light advantage working in your favor. Now I can't defend the slower car who never references his/her opponent and breaks out while said opponent is parked at midtrack but I am 99% sure a faster car has never gotten around a broken car at halftrack and neglected to lift. "Build a faster car" is not the answer people want to hear, especially people who care about preserving great classes that go beyond SS/AM or AA/SA. But not seeing a "true tree" in my opinion, is only a small (and easily corrected) sacrifice for the advantages that lie ahead for the next 1320 feet. Don't forget being the faster car, my friends, is the reason we have that idiotic tool known as a throttle stop in all the super index classes. ![]() Lastly, after I've probably just pissed off a few people! I know it's a bit early but I was wondering if anyone from the east coast has thought of making the trip to Pomona for the Winternationals in February. Please let me know if you have any extra room in your trailer and how much expense money you would like. God bless. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
1) Guys with the faster cars 2) Busy bodies without a class car 3) No names Maybe us "slower" guys in S/SS are just happy being out there racing. Maybe to shut them up NHRA could block the whole tree.What would they want next?Maybe a 10' wall extending down the track for 100' so they could have their Holy Grail: a clean tree. Where does it end?
__________________
Former NHRA #1945 Former IHRA #1945 T/SA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|