HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-19-2010, 02:53 PM   #1
Jim Kaekel
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 133
Liked 535 Times in 110 Posts
Default Re: 2011 ahfs

Quote:
Originally Posted by CWhitney View Post
Why doesn't NHRA just factor all the new cars with right HP. Then we would't be in this mess!
I couldn't have said that it any better myself
__________________
Jim Kaekel 3836 STK
Jim Kaekel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 03:03 PM   #2
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Thumbs up Re: 2011 ahfs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Kaekel View Post
I couldn't have said that it any better myself
X 2 Here we go again !
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 03:12 PM   #3
JRyan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aberdeen SD
Posts: 645
Likes: 30
Liked 112 Times in 31 Posts
Default Re: 2011 ahfs

I have one question regarding using altitude adjusted runs. I'll use my car as an example here. My car runs SS/NA. At sea level my index is a 12.15 at Las Vegas my index is a 12.45. Let's say I run an 11.24 on the timeslip. This would be -1.21 under the index. At sea level this means I'd receive automatic horsepower. However, when you correct that run to sea level which is what is done when setting a record it only equates to a 10.96 and change. That wouldn't trigger automatic horsepower.
So what is NHRA going to actually use for a figure -1.21 altitude run or -1.19 under sea level index? If I was setting a record at the divisional it would be corrected to the 10.96 and that's what would show up as the record. Can any commitee members answer this?

Rick Ryan
JRyan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 03:20 PM   #4
Toby Lang
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 2,133
Likes: 2
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default Re: 2011 ahfs

Mark,

You're right about them adding divisionals and altitude tracks to the mix.

I understand that you and a lot of other people like to go fast. As you know, I have to run against the 340 Mopars. The 340 is a good combo, right? I believe you run a 340 also. It must be a good combo if you chose to build one as you like to go fast.

When was the last time the 340s got hit with HP? I could be wrong, but I don't think they've been hit since I've been running Stock. Then last year they made it even easier to protect the combo by making the triggers softer. With the new AHFS rules the 340s will probably never be hit. Awesome.

My car isn't slow, but it isn't fast either. I did go an 11.07 in F/SA in the first round of class at Phoenix in 2006. Then Mark Dickerson went 10.98 at 103 MPH to beat me in the final.

Diamond Jim is freshening the Whale motor this winter. He's going to try some new things. Hopefully it will pick up some.


-Toby

Last edited by Toby Lang; 11-19-2010 at 03:38 PM.
Toby Lang is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.