New AHFS 2011

[Jeff Teuton]

Art, you don't want to know what we beat back. Trust me.

[Chad Rhodes]

Originally Posted by Jeff Teuton

Art, you don't want to know what we beat back. Trust me.

Jeff, I wish you would tell us. I'd love to know what NHRA really had in mind? It would give us the opportunity to both show our appreciation for your hard work, and at the same time know where we stand and what to look out for.

[RJ Sledge]

Jeff

OK big boy.....I'll trust you, but please don't tell me I get to "soup" up my combo so I can run faster. I will be waiting with baited breath........

RJ

[art leong]

Originally Posted by Jeff Teuton

Art, you don't want to know what we beat back. Trust me.

Jeff if for some reason I get the brake working. and put the other parts on the car. And if I go to Belle Rose next year. how about we run index to index. With the clocks off.
I think I can run with the big dogs LOL

[Tom Moock]

Art, Stock,SuperStock rules committee members, chairman Pat Cvengros, Bob Lang, Bruce Bachelder, Dave Mohn, Bob Blackwell, Danny Gracia. Tom

[art leong]

Okay thanks. When the new div 2 director (seems to be a good guuy by the way) told me the commitee did it. I thought they meant our representitives Glad I got that straight.

[Crew Chief]

Originally Posted by Jeff Teuton

Art, you don't want to know what we beat back. Trust me.

It was probably a 1.10 under immediate hit that would have matched the old 1.40 under hit. Somebody beat it back to 1.20 under. That move alone prolonged all the new cars getting the horsepower closer to where they need to be plus a few older cars that needed the hit anyway.

[B Aceves]

Originally Posted by Crew Chief

It was probably a 1.10 under immediate hit that would have matched the old 1.40 under hit. Somebody beat it back to 1.20 under. That move alone prolonged all the new cars getting the horsepower closer to where they need to be plus a few older cars that needed the hit anyway.

Actually I dont know why it posted like its some BIG SECRET!! but NHRA wanted a
CIC type Index system like Comp the only other option the SRAC had PERIOD......

[Ed Wright]

Originally Posted by B Aceves

Actually I dont know why it posted like its some BIG SECRET!! but NHRA wanted a
CIC type Index system like Comp the only other option the SRAC had PERIOD......

That would have been rough!

[Jeff Teuton]

One only has to look at Comp and see the result of the CIC system. No matter how much 'diversity' NHRA tries to show, the numbers are going down. Barely got a full field in Indy. Nothing against the guys in comp, hell we got one. The CIC system is aimed at one car per class per nation, not 15000 runs in Stock and 11000 in Super Stock and some 39 SS/AH or 30 G/BA. 313 different Comp cars thru Oct 1 (Nitro Joe) compared with 1006 different cars in Super Stock and 1435 in Stock. There are almost as many cars in A/B/C/SA as in Comp as an eliminator. I just don't see the CIC doing anything for S/SS unless the eliminator is run off of index rather than dial-in. If that were to happen, this forum would explode.