|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: SW Mississippi
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
That the 71 383 engines came with a small holley and the 72 400 came with the big Thermobog. I didn't check the weights, but I believe the 400 reciprocating weight was heavier, and therefor I believe the 383 would get into the sweet spot much quicker. I have built both engines (383 and 400) and the 383 always spun quicker. Revved like a small block. The 400 is a good build if you could up the compression because of the large bore. And with the forged crank it can be spun really high. Big blocks that act like small blocks. Gotta love 'em. Last edited by borninamopar; 01-29-2011 at 08:22 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aberdeen SD
Posts: 645
Likes: 30
Liked 112 Times in 31 Posts
|
![]()
Well, being as there is only a 15 gram difference in piston weight and an 18 gram differential in the NHRA accepted weights, I doubt that in STOCK, reciprocating weight has anything to do with whether one will rev quicker than the other. In SUPERSTOCK, it's a moot point as you can make it as light as you dare.
Personally, I'd take the 400. Jerry |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 2,802
Liked 2,486 Times in 697 Posts
|
![]()
We have raced both over the years.......we now (Robbies Roadrunner) run 400 combo. Do not see a lot of flow difference between 906 and 452/346 Heads. BIG difference between small AVS and large thermoquad (really any thermoquad) that is legal on 400. I have never seen a 400 combo that is not FAST from start! I have seen quite a few 383's that the guys have struggled with, although I know a purple '70 383 that is real fast up north. Let me know if I can help on either one. Racer7411@yahoo.com
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|