9.339 @ 143.03 !!!!

Andys dad · 03-12-2011, 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Lee

The prototype V-10 Challenger went 9.50's in AA/SA legal trim in testing so I have to believe 9.20's should not be an issue!

Jeff Lee

I sent you a PM

Thanks

:-) peace

west coast · 03-12-2011, 08:57 PM

How about we see both cars all the way to the 1/4 mile.

SSGN · 03-12-2011, 09:05 PM

Hmmm when Bobby D was the first stocker in the 9s I never thought i would see the first in the 8s but appears poss.
Kevin

davidhuff · 03-12-2011, 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SSGN

Hmmm when Bobby D was the first stocker in the 9s I never thought i would see the first in the 8s but appears poss.Too bad it is not a real stocker but a pupose built race car

Kevin

WOW,ever nhra race I go to all the stockers are purpose built race cars.LOL

SSGN · 03-12-2011, 09:35 PM

????

davidhuff · 03-13-2011, 01:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SSGN

Don't get me wrong very impressive #s,I should have said conventional stocker.Lets be honest 50 units per year,superchargers and carbonfibre parts with zeus buttons.Not really stock and were not the same as Bobby D's car that was purchesed as a daily driver in the day

Kevin

Now I understand that you think a real conventional stocker is a 1969 camaro with aerospace brakes,CP pistons,Manley rods,Bowtie block,Metric 200 trans,Caltec suspension with wheelie bars,MSD igintion.LOL

4284spd · 03-13-2011, 02:14 AM

You could always ban the slow cars if Steve feels it unsafe.

03-12-2011, 08:57 PM	#2
west coast Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Rainy Washington Posts: 613 Likes: 12 Liked 230 Times in 75 Posts	Re: 9.339 @ 143.03 !!!! How about we see both cars all the way to the 1/4 mile.

03-12-2011, 09:05 PM	#3
SSGN Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 649 Likes: 135 Liked 203 Times in 52 Posts	Re: 9.339 @ 143.03 !!!! Hmmm when Bobby D was the first stocker in the 9s I never thought i would see the first in the 8s but appears poss. Kevin Last edited by SSGN; 03-13-2011 at 10:01 AM. Reason: ok

03-12-2011, 09:35 PM	#5
SSGN Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 649 Likes: 135 Liked 203 Times in 52 Posts	Re: 9.339 @ 143.03 !!!! ???? Last edited by SSGN; 03-13-2011 at 10:00 AM. Reason: not interested

03-13-2011, 02:14 AM	#7
4284spd VIP Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Longmont Colorado Posts: 1,709 Likes: 861 Liked 4,139 Times in 950 Posts	Re: 9.339 @ 143.03 !!!! You could always ban the slow cars if Steve feels it unsafe. __________________ Bob Smith

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode