HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-17-2011, 10:05 AM   #1
CycloneFE
Senior Member
 
CycloneFE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Decatur Illinois
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: REALLY, Letter to tech.

I do know of the headaches of the 12 bolts and the Danas, BUT I was at St Louis at a National and witnessed David Rampy break a ring and pinion in his stock Camaro. He and one other fellow had it changed and were qualified a couple of hours later. It was all done right there in the pits, no shop, no fancy stuff, just hard work and a procedure that had obviously been used before.

I guess I am saying there are ways around everything, look and you will find it.

By the way any header suggestions for an FE would be greatly appreciated, PM me.
__________________
Steve Jackson
CycloneFE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 10:31 AM   #2
MikeFicacci
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 242
Likes: 1
Liked 19 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: REALLY, Letter to tech.

This seems to boil down to a problem with the rulebook. We all have opinions on what should and should not be allowed but at the end of the day, something as simple as the center-section issue should be written in black and white in the rulebook. What if Kenny couldn't find a center-section in time? We all know he is one of the most stout supporters of NHRA even when they make stupid decisions. Imagine driving 35 hours round trip with diesel at $4.30 per gallon assuming that your car is 100% legal and getting told to go home, and not because you didn't follow the rulebook to a tee. I agree that his car and others should not have an aluminum center section but the rulebook says nothing about it so I would race it also. I believe that in 2011 with all the technology we have Corvettes should no longer be allowed to put 12-bolts in the cars but that's a different issue.

Plain and simple, NHRA has been tweaking the Engine Blueprints on the new cars more often than not over the last few months. Just go look at the updates on the website. Is it really that hard to clarify something like centersections? It would take someone in Glendora 15 minutes to post a "Racer Update" saying that no one can run aluminum center sections except the new cars and at least the issue would be put to rest.
__________________
Mike Ficacci Stk 1010
MikeFicacci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 10:34 AM   #3
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Default Re: REALLY, Letter to tech.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CycloneFE View Post
I do know of the headaches of the 12 bolts and the Danas, BUT I was at St Louis at a National and witnessed David Rampy break a ring and pinion in his stock Camaro. He and one other fellow had it changed and were qualified a couple of hours later. It was all done right there in the pits, no shop, no fancy stuff, just hard work and a procedure that had obviously been used before.

I guess I am saying there are ways around everything, look and you will find it.

By the way any header suggestions for an FE would be greatly appreciated, PM me.
A lot of guys who run Danas or 12 bolts have a spare ring and pinion already set up to the housing with the correct shims. Carry an inch pound wrench to set the bearing drag and some seals, gaskets and your ready to go. Its a simple deal then to just clean out the broken mess and swap in the new parts. Ive set up rears over the years ahead of time and have done just this same thing. Beats trying to do it in the dirt. Not everyone has a stacker trailer with a lift or a friend who has one. As in Kens case I would have had a spare (Iron) third member in the trailer already to go in case of breakage or crap like happened to him in tech. It would have saved a lot of grief and shipping charges. Probably enough to cover the cost of another carrier.
I agree that the rule book isnt clear BUT if it dosent say you can do something then you should not.

Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 03-17-2011 at 10:37 AM.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 10:36 AM   #4
Stewart Way
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 476
Likes: 20
Liked 70 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: REALLY, Letter to tech.

No measuring and checking if you do your homework. Set the spare gear up at the shop. Keep the shims with it in the trailer. On a Dana you can spread the case or cool the ring gear, spool and bearings in a cooler of ice, slide it in after the pre setup pinion is installed, blow dry and your good to go. Been a long tine but I think we used to use .004 tight on the carrier bearings and with ice the shrinkage was just enough, Sure you might have to be under the car, but not much longer than with a chunk.
__________________
Stewart Way 2424 SS
Stewart Way is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 06:23 PM   #5
gmonde
Senior Member
 
gmonde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 615
Likes: 56
Liked 165 Times in 59 Posts
Default Re: REALLY, Letter to tech.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stewart Way View Post
No measuring and checking if you do your homework. Set the spare gear up at the shop. Keep the shims with it in the trailer. On a Dana you can spread the case or cool the ring gear, spool and bearings in a cooler of ice, slide it in after the pre setup pinion is installed, blow dry and your good to go. Been a long tine but I think we used to use .004 tight on the carrier bearings and with ice the shrinkage was just enough, Sure you might have to be under the car, but not much longer than with a chunk.
to add if they are replacing the same ratio that broke,its not a big deal as long as the pinion depth numbers marked on the pinion are the same or a 1 or 2 thousands off they can use the same shims ,dial indicate the back lash and your good ,if your picky hone your pinion bearing just so it slides on the pinion ,i use a solid pinion spacer this will allow the bearings to be tight it is some work but ,if planned its not bad gmonde
gmonde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 06:30 PM   #6
Tony Janes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 94
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: REALLY, Letter to tech.

The roller rockers is actually under consideration by NHRA
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS
Tony Janes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 07:07 PM   #7
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Thumbs up Re: REALLY, Letter to tech.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Janes View Post
The roller rockers is actually under consideration by NHRA
Thats good....as much as the hard core guys would hate this it makes since. It would cost less than buying a few dozen rockers from a dealer or TRW/Seal Power/etc. and then having to send them out to be treated/coated/frozen and then you still have a bunch of rockers that might break and the ratio is off somewhat. Ive seen dyno pulls that showed no increase in HP by using them over OEM type rockers. It just might save someone an engine down the road with the loads they endure today. OK....Flame away.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 09:09 PM   #8
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,115
Likes: 1,572
Liked 1,829 Times in 414 Posts
Default Re: REALLY, Letter to tech.

Quote:
Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN View Post
Thats good....as much as the hard core guys would hate this it makes since. It would cost less than buying a few dozen rockers from a dealer or TRW/Seal Power/etc. and then having to send them out to be treated/coated/frozen and then you still have a bunch of rockers that might break and the ratio is off somewhat. Ive seen dyno pulls that showed no increase in HP by using them over OEM type rockers. It just might save someone an engine down the road with the loads they endure today. OK....Flame away.
I don't think it makes that much sense. All it will do is change where the weak link is located. The next thing will be another few hundred RPM, and something else that breaks. Then something else to be "enhanced" for more money. The escalation just keeps on, without end. Super Stock has already been "enhanced" well over 1/2 way to where Modified was, and Stock is already 1/2 way to where Super Stock was. Where should it stop? When Super Stock reaches where Comp is, and Stock reaches where Super Stock is?
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 09:20 PM   #9
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Cool Re: REALLY, Letter to tech.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
I don't think it makes that much sense. All it will do is change where the weak link is located. The next thing will be another few hundred RPM, and something else that breaks. Then something else to be "enhanced" for more money. The escalation just keeps on, without end. Super Stock has already been "enhanced" well over 1/2 way to where Modified was, and Stock is already 1/2 way to where Super Stock was. Where should it stop? When Super Stock reaches where Comp is, and Stock reaches where Super Stock is?
Im beginning to think that NHRA is planning to combine stock with S/S some time in the future and replace stock with the "Unleashed" index classes as the so called entry level classes..

Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 03-17-2011 at 09:23 PM.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.