|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 963
Likes: 341
Liked 161 Times in 52 Posts
|
![]()
[QUOTE=Alan Roehrich;283219]A 7.0 class makes sense, but having 6.0 and 6.5 weight breaks is just stupid. Those are Super Stock weight breaks, for a reason.[/QUOT
a lil reliable birdy told me they would be in there own class next year...
__________________
Stephen Johnson #2162 Horace Johnson #2167 SS/D 427 Ford Fairlane NHRA-IHRA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,116
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,830 Times in 415 Posts
|
![]()
[QUOTE=Stephen & Horace Johnson;283223]
Quote:
Well, weight breaks like that in their own class with the right tires and safety equipment would be great for the cars, owners, drivers, and racing. I suggested 10" or 10.5" slicks, 12 point cages, and classes from 6.0 to 12.0 in one pound increments a while back.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
[QUOTE=Stephen & Horace Johnson;283223]A reliable little birdy told me the same thing at Indy.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 2,975
Likes: 2,598
Liked 2,727 Times in 961 Posts
|
![]()
Factory Experimental within Stock Eliminator?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,495
Likes: 3,600
Liked 7,742 Times in 1,740 Posts
|
![]()
I'd almost bet that any type of FX classes would wind up in SS. It seems like SS has become a "dumping ground" for classes that don't exactly fit in Stock or Comp.
I agree with Alan about 6 and 6.5 classes in Stock. A 9" tire would be a scary ride and 10.5 tire puts everyone else at more of a disadvantage.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Monroe, La.
Posts: 301
Likes: 9
Liked 13 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
If they are put into their own class then it's what we've been asking for the last two years. Maybe NHRA has finally seen the light with stock car counts constantly dropping. I hope this includes the lower class cars also. Their numbers are growing. My only concern is that they combine stick and auto cars to make room for the new classes which opens another can of worms since so many combo's have different HP. Many think that the auto cars can consistently compete with the stick cars but a three speed auto with a converter which loses HP going through the converter will not outrun a 4 speed stick when all things are equal. I ran a stick for many years way back when just because it was always faster.
__________________
Richard Grant 4988 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
Transmissions and converters are MUCH more efficent today than "Back When" until you get into the lower and FWD classes. nNly problem is in todays S/S classes is they are now allowed clutchless stick transmissions.
Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 09-18-2011 at 11:50 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|