HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-17-2011, 02:18 AM   #1
Hudlow66
Junior Member
 
Hudlow66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Spokane Valley, WA
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: NHRA allows Alum heads in stock/ss

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris DeGidio View Post
The Edelbrock 383-440 Mopar heads are the same as the Mopar "452"aluminum heads Mopar sells thru MP.They are made for Mopar by Edelbrock,and are legal for S/S.The 2012 Flyer has a part number and says they are legal heads.The Edelbrock heads typically are cheaper price wise than the Mopar 452 aluminum heads.

The Eddy and 452 Mopar heads have 2.14 I and 1.81 E valves whereas the OEM iron head are 2.08 I and 1.74 E.
Neither one of these heads would work for somebody running a '66 383 combo, would they? 2.08 in. but the little 1.60 ex. (like the early "915")
__________________
Phil Hudlow 6678 (S/C, S/G, ET-PRO)
Hudlow66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2011, 02:54 AM   #2
Dean3870
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: shelby, ohio
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: NHRA allows Alum heads in stock/ss

JOKE!!! just call it jr. comp
mike dean
3870
Dean3870 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2011, 03:26 AM   #3
Jim Wahl
Veteran Member
 
Jim Wahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,844
Likes: 667
Liked 683 Times in 129 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jim Wahl Send a message via Yahoo to Jim Wahl
Exclamation Re: NHRA allows Alum heads in stock/ss

Edelbrock #

60107 - 67-73 AMC 343-401

60037 - 67-69 Buick 400-455

61767 - 92-30 Dodge 318-360.......< This is a misprint! I think they mean 92-03 Magnum engines and not the earlier LA engines?

60217 - 64-81 Ford 289-351

60697 - 69-78 Ford 429-460

61657 - 70-71 Ford 429CJ


.
__________________
Jim Wahl....NHRA #2239 S/SS - IHRA # 8 Stock, D2 Stock Champion (forever I guess)
2019 Baby Gators Stock Champion
2009 NHRA D2 National Open Stock Champion
1982 NHRA D2 West Palm Beach LDRS SS Runner Up
Past President, Southern Stock / Super Stock Association.

Last edited by Jim Wahl; 12-17-2011 at 03:46 AM.
Jim Wahl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2011, 03:50 PM   #4
sliver043
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: NHRA allows Alum heads in stock/ss

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean3870 View Post
JOKE!!! just call it jr. comp
mike dean
3870
Ummmm O/K M/SA - JR COMP -- I like the sound of that.... Now i will quote Clint Eastwood nag nag nag !
sliver043 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2011, 04:15 PM   #5
Todd Hoven
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: NHRA allows Alum heads in stock/ss

Thats a little extreem. A few new parts don't make us Comp cars. Now Modified might be more fitting. At least if you run a car with a Holley carb in stock, then you can run a brand new Quick Fuel 750 with all new parts and no HP penatly.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean3870 View Post
JOKE!!! just call it jr. comp
mike dean
3870
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2011, 04:25 PM   #6
Jeff Teuton
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 2
Liked 325 Times in 50 Posts
Default Re: NHRA allows Alum heads in stock/ss

Before I sold my 69 Super Bee, I could not find a pair of 906 castings out of a hugh pile we have accumulated over the years that were worth the 3k or so it takes, and my old stuff done in l995 were getting weak. I know for one new parts are needed for the old cars and they will run faster. In the case of the Mopars, the old 906 heads were 3/8 stems, 2.08 1.74 valves. The Eddys and Mopar come with 2.14 and 1.81 valves and 11/32 stems. So now one has to put in 16 new seats, 16 new guides, and 16 new 3/8 valves. This I disagree with, and suggested the heads out-of-the-box @ +10 (a bargain for any combo) and about $1500 cheaper. The heads have to meet the specs from the year claimed, hence change the aforementioned stuff, and only get +5, probably still a bargain. A move in the right direction. The original configuratiion voiced by some are gone, like Clark Gable, with the wind. And you don't have to run them, just like the rockers. What am I misssing here?
__________________
Jeff Teuton 4022 STK
Jeff Teuton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2011, 04:43 PM   #7
CycloneFE
Senior Member
 
CycloneFE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Decatur Illinois
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: NHRA allows Alum heads in stock/ss

Jeff,

I agree with you and some others. If you stop and think about it, when I started my way into this, wanting to run the 428FE, if I did not have a motor to begin with finding a good one to start with was nearly impossible. Later when I took my motor to my engine guy he stated that my heads(original) were probably the best since the Edelbrock were cast smaller to leave room to port and therefore showed little if any gains on his dyno. The FE head is so small, physically, that the weight savings is negligible also, and I will not have to carry the extra hp. If I did NOT have a motor, the aluminum head would defiantly be the way to go. Old parts are scarce, worn, and if we want to keep racing, we need a little help.

Just my opinion.
__________________
Steve Jackson
CycloneFE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2011, 08:27 PM   #8
Wade_Owens
Senior Member
 
Wade_Owens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
Default Re: NHRA allows Alum heads in stock/ss

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Teuton View Post
The heads have to meet the specs from the year claimed, hence change the aforementioned stuff, and only get +5, probably still a bargain. A move in the right direction. What am I misssing here?
Jeffrey, you know we're tight and I like ya, but, I aint fallen for this one. The specs (volumes) are one thing, the port shapes, guide sizes, short turn radiuses, valve distance to center of the chamber, plug location, chamber shape etc, are all going to be better. Why would Edelbrock build an EXACT duplicate of ANY oe cylinder head? They are going to install all known performance advantages to entice the buyer to purchase a set of these "replacement" heads. Like I said, otherwise, why bother? Original heads are out there. If you chose a combo that these parts are not available, you shouldnt lobby for an aftermarket part. (No disrespect to anyone that has, this is my opinion) If I decide to run a Max Wedge, I had better be prepared to search my *** of for a set of unmolested original heads. Carbs are also very hard to find too, but I dont want a Holley accepted on my 283. What you are missing is the oe heads cant legally have these mods that are already engineered into these accepted heads. Remember the angled spark plug adapters? And for the record, I dont think the Pontiacs or the BBC's replacements should have ever been allowed either! But, the barn door has been left open......

I look forward to drinking a tall glass of tea and discussing it at Belle Rose with ya, cant wait for March!!

Wade O
Wade_Owens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2011, 12:01 AM   #9
Todd Hoven
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: NHRA allows Alum heads in stock/ss

Wade, Pontiac has no aftermarket replacement heads accepted. If nobody was allowed replacement heads I would not want any for my combo. Since the cat is out of the bag, why shoudnt somebody that has to race against these guys lobby for the same type of parts. If we could only roll back the rules to 1977. Those were the days.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2011, 12:19 AM   #10
Wade_Owens
Senior Member
 
Wade_Owens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
Default Re: NHRA allows Alum heads in stock/ss

Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd Hoven View Post
Wade, Pontiac has no aftermarket replacement heads accepted. If nobody was allowed replacement heads I would not want any for my combo. Since the cat is out of the bag, why shoudnt somebody that has to race against these guys lobby for the same type of parts. If we could only roll back the rules to 1977. Those were the days.
Todd, don't get me wrong on this, I do understand why. Just don't blow smoke and tell us they are replacement heads, I don't buy it. If aftermarket parts are allowed for one, they should be legal and readily available for all combos.
Don't the 428 Pontiacs use an alum aftermarket head?
These type of changes are why a simple valve spring rule later causes people to ask for aftermarket seats. The quicker et's are now a cause for safety concerns. Butterfly effect, eh?
Anyway, we'll see how it all goes, can't unring a bell, right?

Wade O
Wade_Owens is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.