|
|
|
|
12-17-2011, 02:09 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Mo-ta City
Posts: 247
Likes: 60
Liked 31 Times in 12 Posts
|
Re: Could GM Be Serious About The COPO?
The chassis is just fine. First passes with a brand new car. The fly-by-wire throttle function was lazy and they'll get it worked out.
Do Challenger Drag Paks work ok? There ya go :-) |
|
|
|
12-19-2011, 08:22 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: zoo york
Posts: 572
Likes: 3
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: Could GM Be Serious About The COPO?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-19-2011, 09:06 PM
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: usa
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Could GM Be Serious About The COPO?
Show us the time slips . Please
__________________
Bo Kenney |
|
|
|
|
12-19-2011, 09:15 PM
|
#4 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 2
Liked 325 Times in 50 Posts
|
Re: Could GM Be Serious About The COPO?
Drag Pak cars have manual throttle bodies, all motors including the v10. I always thought NHRA didn't like the dbw, but technical stuff is above my head.
__________________
Jeff Teuton 4022 STK |
|
|
|
|
12-19-2011, 09:23 PM
|
#5 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
Re: Could GM Be Serious About The COPO?
Drive by wire is just one more thing to cause problems. Can't imagine why they want it. Mechanical throttle limiters are an easy way to slow one down.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
